Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Test: {mingw64-{i686,x86_64}-,}gcc-11.1.0-0.1

2021-05-12 Thread Thomas Wolff
Am 13.05.2021 um 03:41 schrieb Brian Inglis: On 2021-05-12 12:30, Thomas Wolff wrote: Am 12.05.2021 um 12:42 schrieb Jonathan Yong via Cygwin: On 5/12/21 9:14 AM, Thomas Wolff wrote: Am 10.05.2021 um 21:13 schrieb Achim Gratz: The native and mingw-w64 cross compilers have been updated for b

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Test: {mingw64-{i686,x86_64}-,}gcc-11.1.0-0.1

2021-05-12 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2021-05-12 12:30, Thomas Wolff wrote: Am 12.05.2021 um 12:42 schrieb Jonathan Yong via Cygwin: On 5/12/21 9:14 AM, Thomas Wolff wrote: Am 10.05.2021 um 21:13 schrieb Achim Gratz: The native and mingw-w64 cross compilers have been updated for both architectures to the latest upstream releas

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Test: {mingw64-{i686,x86_64}-,}gcc-11.1.0-0.1

2021-05-12 Thread Achim Gratz
Thomas Wolff writes: > Am 10.05.2021 um 21:13 schrieb Achim Gratz: >> The native and mingw-w64 cross compilers have been updated for both >> architectures to the latest upstream release version: >> >> gcc-11.1.0-0.1 > Are there any known problems with gcc 11? My program crashes if > compiled with

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Test: {mingw64-{i686,x86_64}-,}gcc-11.1.0-0.1

2021-05-12 Thread Thomas Wolff
Am 12.05.2021 um 12:42 schrieb Jonathan Yong via Cygwin: On 5/12/21 9:14 AM, Thomas Wolff wrote: Am 10.05.2021 um 21:13 schrieb Achim Gratz: The native and mingw-w64 cross compilers have been updated for both architectures to the latest upstream release version:   gcc-11.1.0-0.1 Are there any

[ANNOUNCEMENT] meson 0.57.2-1

2021-05-12 Thread Jon Turney
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution: * meson-0.57.2-1 Meson is an open source build system meant to be extremely fast. It generates files for various backends including Ninja, Visual Studio, and Xcode. Meson does not generate Makefiles, relying solely on Nin

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-{headers, runtime, winpthreads}-8.0.2-1 (x86/x86_64)

2021-05-12 Thread Jonathan Yong via Cygwin-announce via Cygwin
Now released for both 32bit and 64bit Cygwin: Notable changes: * Fixed building with GCC 11 *** CYGWIN-ANNOUNCE UNSUBSCRIBE INFO *** If you want to unsubscribe from the cygwin-announce mailing list, look at the "List-Unsubscribe: " tag in the email header of this message. Send ema

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Test: {mingw64-{i686,x86_64}-,}gcc-11.1.0-0.1

2021-05-12 Thread Jonathan Yong via Cygwin
On 5/12/21 9:14 AM, Thomas Wolff wrote: Am 10.05.2021 um 21:13 schrieb Achim Gratz: The native and mingw-w64 cross compilers have been updated for both architectures to the latest upstream release version:   gcc-11.1.0-0.1 Are there any known problems with gcc 11? My program crashes if compiled

Fw: Web Designing

2021-05-12 Thread Lizelle Lee via Cygwin
Hi Cygwin, Hope this mail finds you good..! My Name is Lizella Lee, I am a professional Web design & Mobile App Developer; I can upgrade, Repair and Redesign your website. Would you be interested in: - We Provides SEO & Web services at a minimum cost, May I send you quote? If interested.

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Test: {mingw64-{i686,x86_64}-,}gcc-11.1.0-0.1

2021-05-12 Thread Thomas Wolff
Am 10.05.2021 um 21:13 schrieb Achim Gratz: The native and mingw-w64 cross compilers have been updated for both architectures to the latest upstream release version: gcc-11.1.0-0.1 Are there any known problems with gcc 11? My program crashes if compiled with gcc -O2; gcc -O1 works, gcc 10 als

Re: realpath issue with native[strict] symlinks

2021-05-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin
On May 12 10:10, Andrey Repin via Cygwin wrote: > Greetings, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin! > > > I reworked the code handling native symlinks to handle virtual drives > > as well. It might even be a tiny bit quicker now. > > > The changes have a behavioral change, but I think this is for the > >

Re: realpath issue with native[strict] symlinks

2021-05-12 Thread Andrey Repin via Cygwin
Greetings, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin! > I reworked the code handling native symlinks to handle virtual drives > as well. It might even be a tiny bit quicker now. > The changes have a behavioral change, but I think this is for the > better: Virtual drives are not treated as drives anymore, but