Re: mmap failure [was: cygrunsrv + sshd + rsync = 20 times too slow -- throttled?]

2021-09-07 Thread Ken Brown via Cygwin
On 9/6/2021 11:34 PM, Brian Inglis wrote: On 2021-09-06 15:24, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: On 9/6/2021 4:54 PM, Peter Dons Tychsen wrote: Hi there, On Mon, 2021-09-06 at 14:40 -0400, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: No, wait.  I get what you say.  The optimzation settings of the test case should h

Re: Broken dependencies for net-snmp-utils and perl-net-snmp

2021-09-07 Thread Achim Gratz
Richard H. Gumpertz writes: > Did you ever find fix for this? The net-snmp package (which provides perl-net-snmp as a sub-package) is orphaned by its former maintainer, which means it has not been updated in a while. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk B

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: Perl distributions

2021-09-07 Thread Achim Gratz
The following Perl distributions have been updated to their latest release version available on CPAN: noarch -- perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian-0.105-1 perl-Test-MockModule-0.177.0-1 perl-Text-Template-1.60-1 -- *** CYGWIN-ANNOUNCE UNSUBSCRIBE INFO *** If you want to unsubscr

Re: mmap failure [was: cygrunsrv + sshd + rsync = 20 times too slow -- throttled?]

2021-09-07 Thread Peter Dons Tychsen
Hi Ken, On Mon, 2021-09-06 at 17:24 -0400, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: > You're looking at the wrong source code.  The bug didn't occur until > the code > was changed to do the following: You are right. I do not know why i looked at an old checkout of the code. Shame on me! Sorry for wasting you

RE: mmap failure [was: cygrunsrv + sshd + rsync = 20 times too slow -- throttled?]

2021-09-07 Thread Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] via Cygwin
> > > > With undocumented structure member initialization an issue, maybe better to > > future proof using e.g. > > > > MEM_EXTENDED_PARAMETER mmap_ext = { 0 }; // or memset or bzero > > I don't see what this would accomplish. We're already initializing every > member > after Corinna's last

Re: mmap failure [was: cygrunsrv + sshd + rsync = 20 times too slow -- throttled?]

2021-09-07 Thread Ken Brown via Cygwin
On 9/7/2021 5:52 PM, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] wrote: With undocumented structure member initialization an issue, maybe better to future proof using e.g. MEM_EXTENDED_PARAMETER mmap_ext = { 0 }; // or memset or bzero I don't see what this would accomplish. We're already init

Re: mmap failure [was: cygrunsrv + sshd + rsync = 20 times too slow -- throttled?]

2021-09-07 Thread Sam Edge via Cygwin
On 07/09/2021 23:44, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote: > > MS can't add a new named field to a documented struct without breaking a lot of code.  I think it's extremely unlikely that they would do that.  On the other hand, I think it's very likely that a reader of the Cygwin code would be confused by c