Re: weird error gpg

Greetings, Jim McNamara! > I took the bottom of the sha256sum > file where it was ascii armor and pasted it into notepad and saved it.  Thus destroyed the very possiblity of checking your setup. Do not touch the signature file. Save it literal. > I don't know why it isn't verifying. You did tha

oh duh.... gpg

Hi- I'm so embarrassed. They want to make it so that if the checksum is valid that I can then just run the checksum. I am s spacey today. Sorry, THANKS jim -- Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation:https:

i put a printout of all the commands I ran for gpg including the one that failed

$ gpg --list-keys | grep 38AB71F4 pub   4096R/38AB71F4 2021-02-10 $ ls Fedora* Fedora-KDE-Live-x86_64-36-1.5.iso  Fedora-Spins-36-1.5-x86_64-CHECKSUM $ gpg --verify Fedora-Spins-36-1.5-x86_64-CHECKSUM gpg: Signature made Fri May  6 10:21:35 2022 EDT using RSA key ID 38AB71F4 gpg: Good signature

Re: the gpg and asci/sha256sums files are located here

On 6/24/2022 11:46 AM, Jim McNamara via Cygwin wrote: https://getfedora.org/static/checksums/36/iso/Fedora-Spins-36-1.5-x86_64-CHECKSUM $ curl -O https://getfedora.org/static/fedora.gpg https://spins.fedoraproject.org/kde/download/index.html I think that is all I need. I ran the curl command an

Re: weird error gpg

Hi, Two things come to mind: 1. Is the file fedora.asc being through an editor? Does it have \r\n terminators by accident? i.e. is DOS formated, not the original format. 2. You should be using the original file, I don't see the point of what you pasted into Notepad, and Notepad by default wi

the gpg and asci/sha256sums files are located here

HI- https://getfedora.org/static/checksums/36/iso/Fedora-Spins-36-1.5-x86_64-CHECKSUM $ curl -O https://getfedora.org/static/fedora.gpg https://spins.fedoraproject.org/kde/download/index.html I think that is all I need. I ran the curl command and imported the fedora.gpg file first. thanks! --

Re: weird error gpg

Hi Rene- Everything you mentioned checked out. I took the bottom of the sha256sum file where it was ascii armor and pasted it into notepad and saved it.  I don't know why it isn't verifying. I named that file fedora.asc. Here is what the original file looks like.  Please see below for the part

Re: weird error gpg

On 6/24/2022 10:55 AM, Jim McNamara via Cygwin wrote: $ gpg --verify fedora.asc Fedora-KDE-Live-x86_64-36-1.5.iso gpg: can't handle text lines longer than 19995 characters gpg: Signature made Fri May  6 10:21:35 2022 EDT using RSA key ID 38AB71F4 gpg: BAD signature from "Fedora (36) " I am havi

weird error gpg

Hi guys- $ cd /cygdrive/c/Users/DeathDealer/Downloads $ gpg --verify fedora.asc Fedora-KDE-Live-x86_64-36-1.5.iso gpg: can't handle text lines longer than 19995 characters gpg: Signature made Fri May  6 10:21:35 2022 EDT using RSA key ID 38AB71F4 gpg: BAD signature from "Fedora (36) " I am havin

gdb itself core dumps

Hello mailing list, I was in the middle of deep debugging session when following happened: 103 allocate(size_type __n, const void* = static_cast(0)) (gdb) s __wrap__Znwm (sz=85) at /usr/src/debug/cygwin-3.3.5-1/winsup/cygwin/libstdcxx_wrapper.cc:55 55return (*user_data->cxx_mall

setup 2.919 release candidate - please test

A new setup release candidate is available at: https://cygwin.com/setup/setup-2.919.x86_64.exe (64 bit version) https://cygwin.com/setup/setup-2.919.x86.exe(32 bit version) Please test, and report any problems here. This is not the place for setup feature requests. Changes compared to 2