On 2023-10-12 18:41, xvac wrote:
Oct 13, 2023, 08:39 by xvac:
I find sqlite3 and postgresql packages in cygwin is outdate, anyone can up it
to latest?
I would say postgresql is only lagging a few months because the maintainer is
busy with many other packages:
https://cygwin.com/pac
On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 04:33:47 +0200
Thomas Wolff wrote:
> Am 13.10.2023 um 02:41 schrieb xvac--- via Cygwin:
> > zig lang
> > nim lang
> > rust lang
> >
> > also should add to cygwin official repo.
> The Rust project does not support build on cygwin (see
> https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/7
Am 13.10.2023 um 02:41 schrieb xvac--- via Cygwin:
zig lang
nim lang
rust lang
also should add to cygwin official repo.
The Rust project does not support build on cygwin (see
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79854).
Never heard of zig or nim.
Oct 13, 2023, 08:39 by x...@tuta.io:
zig lang
nim lang
rust lang
also should add to cygwin official repo.
Oct 13, 2023, 08:39 by x...@tuta.io:
> Hi cygwin member,
>
> I find sqlite3 and postgresql packages in cygwin is outdate, anyone can up it
> to latest?
>
> also, many new CLI tools should add to cygwin official repo.
> eg, `b
Hi cygwin member,
I find sqlite3 and postgresql packages in cygwin is outdate, anyone can up it
to latest?
also, many new CLI tools should add to cygwin official repo.eg, `bun` :
https://github.com/oven-sh/bun
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: ht
On 10/12/2023 2:46 PM, Eric Hendrickson via Cygwin wrote:
And your point about the effort involved and no known bugs is well taken of
course but Cygwin is still distributing EOL software. This is why I asked,
would it make sense to just not release new non emergency versions of Cygwin
with EO
Thank you, Adam, for your constructive response.
So, I hear what you are saying of course. I’m not asking people to do more
work, I was just asking if these factors (EOL software) are important to
Cygwin. I realize that’s nuanced but nevertheless this is so.
The comparison to Debian Stable - I
Picking up a few threads that I think others might have missed, and
which I think are worthy of acknowledgement…
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 05:16, Eric D Hendrickson via Cygwin
wrote:
> How does Cygwin being an all volunteer effort have any bearing on this
> question, other than the time and interest
Am Mi., 11.Okt..2023 um 18:37:29 schrieb Hendrickson, Eric D via Cygwin:
Hello all,
As a ~25 year user and sometime contributor to Cygwin, I support Cygwin here at
my place of work. Does anyone know why we are deploying Ruby 2.6 which EOL
about 18 months ago?
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/d
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 10:59 PM wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 09:55:04PM -0500, Eric D Hendrickson wrote:
Sorry for the unclarity - I meant this for the whole list - not just you.
Thank you so much for taking the time to respond. Like you said, this
really is all volunteers.
For the whole l
A new setup release candidate is available at:
https://cygwin.com/setup/setup-2.927.x86_64.exe (64 bit version)
https://cygwin.com/setup/setup-2.927.x86.exe(32 bit version)
Please test, and report any problems here.
Changes compared to 2.926:
- Added Ctrl+K accelerator for keep or skip
I don’t know who all is on this distribution but I’m going to be very clear.
I asked a few very reasonable questions in regard to security and best
practices for a mature and widely known product like Cygwin. In this context,
it doesn’t matter much that it’s all volunteers except in terms of res
On 2023-10-11 16:47, Yasuhiro Kimura via Cygwin wrote:
From: "Hendrickson, Eric D via Cygwin"
Subject: Ruby EOL in Cygwin 3.4.9?
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 16:37:29 +
Hello all,
As a ~25 year user and sometime contributor to Cygwin, I support Cygwin here at
my place of work. Does anyone kno
13 matches
Mail list logo
