I installed 1.7 and gave g++ a quick try.
It looks like C++ wide string and stream support is still not available.
This has been a long time irritation for some of us in the Boost
community. What can we do to help get C++ full wide character support
into cygwin? Is this the right list or is th
What's the story on wide character support for GCC? Are wchar_t,
std::wstring, etc., still not supported by cygwin?
If not, what would it take to get wide character support working? Is there a
lot of work involved? Is it something an outside developer could contribute?
--Beman
#define UINTMAX_C(x) x ## ULL
--Beman Dawes
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 09:22:56PM -0400, Beman Dawes wrote:
>>usr/include/stdint.h beginning at line 177 reads:
>>
>>/* Macros for greatest-width integer constant expressi
wlib people working on the problem in, which is
where the problem needs to be solved. They really need encouragement that
people do care about wide character support, and that not having it is a
black eye for an otherwise excellent and highly appreciated Cygwin effort.
IMO of course.
--Beman
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 10:08:30PM -0400, Beman Dawes wrote:
>>I've been in contact with Newlib people working on the problem in, which
>>is
>>where the problem needs to
ld like to eliminate as many gcc/cygwin failures as
possible. See http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/
Thanks,
--Beman Dawes
>
>Many thanks,
>
>John.
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Larry Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "John Maddock"
At 04:12 PM 1/3/2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>Hallo Beman,
>
>I cannot reproduce it here on my NT4 SP 6a:
John Maddock can't reproduce it on his system either.
First, my results for the queries below are shown after your results:
>$ uname -svr
>CYGWIN_NT-4.0 1.5.5(0.94/3/2) 2003-09-20 16:31
CYGW
n 3.3.1 (cygming
special) rather than just GNU C++ version 3.3.1. I assume that is to be
expected.
Thanks!
--Beman Dawes
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
9 matches
Mail list logo