Re: SSH client hang running uncompressed tar on various servers

2005-01-10 Thread Brett Porter
anks, Brett On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:40:23 +0100, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 10 22:09, Brett Porter wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm having a problem with my SSH client hanging executing a remote > > command extracting an uncompressed tar. This o

SSH client hang running uncompressed tar on various servers

2005-01-10 Thread Brett Porter
Hi, I'm having a problem with my SSH client hanging executing a remote command extracting an uncompressed tar. This occurs on different servers (FreeBSD, localhost Cygwin SSHD, RHL9), though they are all SSH2 and I've using the same private DSA key. Given this, it isn't the tar executable (though

Re: Getting all "man" pages?

2002-02-20 Thread Brett Porter
Is there any reason this isn't part of the cygwin distro.? I would have thought they went along with libc, etc. I can think of a couple of reasons: size, extra maintenance time. Both fair enough. But I wonder if it isn't a hassle if it might be a good idea. I remember back to my DJGPP days where

Re: Restructuring the automake and autoconf packages

2001-12-02 Thread Brett Porter
> No. The new path setting is only good for *called* > processes in the > same fork/exec chain. The parent shell's PATH is > not modified, so once > 'autoconf' finishes and you drop back into your > interactive shell, your > old PATH is back in effect. > Sorry, I must have misunderstood. The

Re: Restructuring the automake and autoconf packages

2001-12-02 Thread Brett Porter
I have a couple of questions regarding this (apologies if already covered - I'm on the digest and only got this message on announce). Let's see if I understand correctly: 1. you run autoconf 2. it sets the path based on a wrapper script 3. next execution goes to the desired one directly. Doesn't