Missed patch? (gettimeofday time travels V2)

2003-01-13 Thread Fish
yet? http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-05/msg00962.html Was this perhaps just a simple oversight? Or was there another reason for it not being applied? Thanks. - -- "Fish" (David B. Trout) [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.0.

RE: Missed patch? (gettimeofday time travels V2)

2003-01-14 Thread Fish
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 09:55:15PM -0800, Fish wrote: > > > >Is there any reason why Philip Aston's 6 Jul 2002 patch to > >gettimeofday et. al. logic to correct for WM_POWERBROADCAST event

Anyone having problem with 'man' permissions?

2004-08-03 Thread Fish
ck I can do to try and figure for myself what the heck is going on?) - -- "Fish" (David B. Trout) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fight Spam! Join CAUCE! http://www.cauce.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBQQ+MGUj11/TE7j4qEQKWmQCgxsvV/GsKFmUgFb6PGoerziiKkeUAoOo

RESEND man.conf permissions problem

2004-08-04 Thread Fish
?) whereas now it DOESN'T. I only noticed it today when I tried to view the man page for gcc: - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ man gcc Warning: cannot open configuration file /usr/share/misc/man.conf No manual entry for gcc [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ cd /usr/share/misc

RE: Anyone having problem with 'man' permissions?

2004-08-04 Thread Fish
else (or several someone elses!) to respond to my "original" (re-)post (i.e. the one explaining my problem/issue) with some suggestions and/or potential answers -- assuming of course it makes it to the list this time! -- and I'll be a happy camper. :) Thanks again. - -- "Fish&quo

Permissions problem (was: RESEND man.conf permissions problem)

2004-08-04 Thread Fish
ht be going on?? Anyone at all? :( - -- "Fish" (David B. Trout) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fight Spam! Join CAUCE! http://www.cauce.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBQRDsEkj11/TE7j4qEQIniQCfT286gzKj3wKb5EC43Fs8Kkw1meQAnimK IZ3fPRs6osH1c5pRZHWeq6eH =9qV

RE: RESEND man.conf permissions problem

2004-08-05 Thread Fish
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Larry Hall wrote: > From the information you provided so far, it looks to me > like you installed initially some things as "Administator" > and subsequently some others as "fish". Correct. Is that not allowed?? Would

RE: RESEND man.conf permissions problem

2004-08-05 Thread Fish
there's any type of "experimentation" scenario[1] you or anyone else would like me to try in order to try and get to the bottom of this issue, I'd be more than happy to do it. - -- "Fish" (David B. Trout) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fight Spam! Join CAUCE! http://www.cauce.org/ [1] E.

Cygwin permissions problem

2004-08-07 Thread Fish
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I (Fish) wrote: > Just thought I'd throw this into the mix too in case it might help: > > > I *do* have Microsoft's "Virtual PC" product installed on my system > (and already have a couple of test Windows 20

RE: Cygwin permissions problem

2004-08-07 Thread Fish
able permissions, while others (like /etc) > don't. Yep. :( > In addition to the properties menu, you can quickly > visualize permissions with the Windows "cacls" program. Output attached. Any help/insight you or anyone else can provide would be much appreciated. Thanks

RE: Cygwin permissions problem

2004-08-07 Thread Fish
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fish wrote: > Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > > In your case, it looks like some directories (like /bin) > > have OK inheritable permissions, while others (like /etc) > > don't. > > Yep. :( Addt'l info: ca

RESOLVED (?): Cygwin permissions problem

2004-08-10 Thread Fish
e help me to understand why *SOME* type of "public" permissions set is [apparently] required by Cygwin? (*nix?) Thanks. - -- "Fish" (David B. Trout) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fight Spam! Join CAUCE! http://www.cauce.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBQRmCH0j11/

RE: RESOLVED (?): Cygwin permissions problem

2004-08-11 Thread Fish
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Larry Hall wrote: > Fish wrote: > > Could some kind soul out there help me to understand why > > *SOME* type of "public" permissions set is [apparently] > > required by Cygwin? (*nix?) > > > > Thanks.

Are older/prior version(s) of Cygwin available for download somewhere?

2003-09-15 Thread Fish
, and the only version it offers is the current 1.5.3-1 version which I don't want. I want to be able to download, say, the 1.3.22 I'm using. Don't you (or SOMEONE) maintain an archive of older versions somewhere where I can direct users to? Thanks. -- "Fish" (David

Building Linux hosted cross compiler to cygwin target

2004-01-13 Thread Fred Fish
Does anyone have a pointer to a detailed set of instructions for building a linux hosted (i686-pc-linux-gnu) toolchain to a cygwin target (i686-pc-cygwin) starting from the bare CVS sources with no precompiled/preinstalled components? I've spent a couple of days trying to build this from the curre