On 2018-01-04 19:21, Erik Soderquist wrote:
When I had to rebase, I had to track down and stop all cygwin services
as well. I went to Windows Task Manager, added the image path name
and sorted by it to find what all from cygwin was still running, and
shut them down.
Maybe just for the recor
Hi,
On 29.11.2016 17:27, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, Erik Bray!
Thanks for the reply. The issue here isn't getting the Windows
process environment--that can be done, albeit trickily [1]. While
it's true there are security implications, in this case that is
handled at the OpenProcess call
Hi Peter,
On 11/11/2016 1:15 AM, Peter A. Castro wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016, Herbert Stocker wrote:
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:11:16 +0100
From: Herbert Stocker
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: WinXP is dead [WAS: 2.6.x: broken compatibility with Wine]
Hi,
Greetings, Herbert,
On
f i have to ask for permission to do
so given it is open source.
Am i allowed to do this?
best regards,
Herbert Stocker
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:
On 11/2/2016 2:13 PM, cyg Simple wrote:
On 11/2/2016 9:04 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 11/02/2016 05:43 AM, Andrey ``Bass'' Shcheglov wrote:
Remote host said: 550-5.7.1 Unauthenticated email from vanav.org is not
accepted due to domain's > 550-5.7.1 DMARC policy. Please contact the
administrator
On 10/13/2016 11:17 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> The point is that on Linux/Unix platforms, command-line utilities do
not pop up
> windows, or any other kind of UI, which seek user input. Doing so can
> cause scripted processes to appear to "hang" and clutter the desktop.
Not so anymore. J
On 01.10.2016 23:32, Vlado wrote:
> On 1.10.2016 17:52, Gene Pavlovsky wrote:
>> Before running setup.exe I've set the system env var
>> CYGWIN=winsymlinks:native
>> After that I ran setup-x86_64.exe and installed cygwin64.
>> The symlinks to .exe files in bin, created by setup, are not native
>>
Hi,
On 28.09.2016 23:05, Wayne Porter wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 07:52:05PM +, Thomas Sanders wrote:
gpg --verify setup-x86.exe.sig setup-x86.exe
gpg: Signature made Fri 09 Sep 2016 02:20:02 AM PDT using DSA key ID 676041BA
gpg: Good signature from "Cygwin "
gpg: WARNING: This key is no
On 30.08.2016 23:26, Erik Soderquist wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Andrey Repin wrote:
Now try to pipe something from a native application to your UFW build, and
then the results from it to something else native.
I'm eagerly awaiting reports of your success.
Done it already, using ne
nvironment, and then you can add the .exe where its needed
i think.
best regards,
Herbert Stocker
--Ken Nellis
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:
On 26.08.2016 15:19, Lee Dilkie wrote:
On 8/26/2016 9:08 AM, Nellis, Kenneth wrote:
Dear Cygwin Community,
$ ls -l
total 60
-rwxr-x--- 1 knellis Domain Users 60927 Aug 26 08:57 hello.exe
$ ./hello
Hello, world!
$ cygpath -w hello
hello
$
The purpose of cygpath -w, it seems to me, is to provi
On 8/9/2016 2:45 AM, Michel LaBarre wrote:
It could very well be that, as one response to me on this thread
alluded, CYGWIN's role is to provide the equivalent of an isolated
> POSIX VM under Windows without the VM.
Having used Cygwin for a long time, maybe 10 or 13 years, i see
that CYGWIN is
On 05.08.2016 17:29, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
If you see the
code required to handle .exe and .lnk extensions you don't *want*
PATHEXT support anymore.
Moreso, this code has recently broken my C++ code in Cygwin.
It tried to see if a directory /dir/subdir/something existed,
and Cygwin said y
Hi Bill,
i agree with you that there are only two context switches involved
and that Cygwin processes are not 2nd class performance.
But i was *not* talking about context switches.
i was talking about *translating of semantics* mostly in my mail.
Because i was trying to avoid translation from P
Hi Bill,
this is now my proposal of an alternative mode for WinFsp to support
Cygwin based FUSE file systems. I'll call it mode (4).
It's actually my initial idea that i have in mind for some time but
did not propose to implement because i have some constraints that
prevent me from completing it.
On 6/17/2016 9:25 AM, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote:
WinFsp provides three (3) different modes of integration:
(1) Its own native API, which allows a user mode file system to do almost
anything NTFS can do (with a few exceptions). It also allows for the
Read, Write and ReadDirectory callbacks to be a
On 16.06.2016 08:37, Bill Zissimopoulos wrote:
I am not porting anything from UNIX. I have a Windows solution developed
using Visual Studio and the Windows Driver Kit that I am building a FUSE
compatibility layer for. My DLL is not a Cygwin DLL. It is a native
Windows DLL that also has a FUSE co
pdates.
my 2 cents,
Herbert Stocker
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
On 17.04.2016 23:27, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, John Cowan!
Andrey Repin scripsit:
Of course, it is efficient.
More efficient, than starting a shell each time I need to diff a file.
Or 2-3 shells, if you call a wrapper. Which is least efficient, considering
retarded CMD quoting rules.
On 12.04.2016 14:50, Andrew Schulman wrote:
But unlike with Cygwin, Linux apps don't have to be rebuilt -
they can run natively as-is in Windows 10.
So it's not the same thing as Cygwin, technically, it's more like a
reverse Wine.
So you can get, allegedly, the full Linux userland out-of-the-
On 13.04.2016 02:11, Andrew Schulman wrote:
If they really would like to port Unix on MS, it will be enough to
provide Corinna with a simple way to implement fork
But if they want to play Embrace, Extend and Extinguish[1]
they have to do the whole thing by themselves.
[1]: https://en.wik
ssions or such.
then this is what wget does. It downloads the file and stores it with
default permissions.
i also find it a bit inconvenient to use chmod +x but that's correct
behaviour for wget.
And i just found out that a chmod +x is also necessary when extracting
ZIP files w
Hi,
i have read that beginning this month Cygwin wants to drop support
for Windows XP. Though the home page and FAQ entry 12 do not talk
about this. Are they out of date or is WinXP still supported?
Although there are better OSes now, WinXP is still a good OS.
Especially for virtual machines, b
On 09.03.2015 18:35, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, Kevin Layer!
I'm running sshd on Windows (Server 2008 R2). When I run Windows
programs via ssh the windows are not visible. I realize this is a
long shot, but is there any fix or workaround or hack to this?
This is OS architectural change
Hi Gokulnath,
On 3/13/2013 3:30 AM, Gokulnath Arjunan wrote:
Hi,
Below is my setup.
Windows servers 2008 which is running some jboss applications.
I have Cygwin installed with SSH setup
I can login to windows server from any other linux machine using ssh.
Use case: I am able to run the dos sc
Hi Bjørndal,
have you tried mintty?
i don't know if BRLTTY is compatible with it, but if so, it's a much
much better alternative
to the DOS box. You can freely change the window size, and it has no
limit on the
font sizes.
To start mintty, Cygwin setup creates a shortcut on the desktop.
But y
On 17.08.2012 09:17, Gary wrote:
Every time I use it I have to remember to deselect all the packages it
marks for "upgrade". Why? Why is it so bad to want to use Subversion
release 1.6, for example? Especially since 1.7 does not work with
working copies created under 1.6. Why should we expose our
Hi Ryan,
On 13.08.2012 15:33, Ryan Johnson wrote:
Hi all,
I'm hitting a mouse-related (?) problem with mintty in non-mouse mode.
STC A: Log into a remote machine, invoke `sleep 10', and -- during the
wait --- click anywhere on the line containing the cursor.
STC B: Open tinyirc and click a
On 13.08.2012 10:47, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 13 10:24, Herbert Stocker wrote:
There is no need for the 'no', i'd suggest ELIBBAD.
Not bad, either. So we have ELIBACC, ELIBBADD, and ENOPKG as
suggestions.
I'd vote against ENOPKG. That means: /* Package not install
Hi,
Imho, EACCESS is indeed a bit misleading because it suggests permission
problems. Better would be to have an EFAIL as a generic error. Actually i
was missing an EFAIL several times when my programs needed to return
an error code that did not match well with what i found in errno.h .
On Sun,
30 matches
Mail list logo