Re: Available for testing: tar-1.13.25-5

Listed-incremental backups are working again with the new binary. Although, upgrading from tar-1.13.25-1 (the last version where listed-incremental backups functioned correctly) to tar-1.13.25-5 will cause all files (except those in the top-level directory) to be archived, even if they haven't been

Re: New tar available for testing (was Re: here is a patch for gnu tar incremental backup...)

On Sat, Nov 8, 2003 cgf wrote: > Thanks for the patch but I don't think it is quite right and I don't > think it catches everything. > > I'm uploading a new version of tar for testing now. I'd appreciate > feedback (to the cygwin list) on whether it solves the reported problem. The binary you've

Re: cygwin dll makes gnu tar think that directories have been renamed?

For future reference, see: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-10/msg01653.html for a possible patch for this issue. Jeremy -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/doc

Re: cygwin dll makes gnu tar think that directories have been renamed?

I've had a similar problem. Here's some more detail, and what I found when I looked into the problem... With the tar executable from the tar-1.13.25-1 binary package, listed-incremental backups work as expected: ichthus$ mkdir test ichthus$ touch test/foobar ichthus$ mkdir test/foo ichthus$ touch