reason that I can determine.
Does anyone know why the behavior of KERNEL32 API functions would behave
differently for Cygwin apps? Is there any kind of behind-the-scenes
library hooking going on that I'm unaware of? Can anyone repeat this
behavior? I'm at a loss to provide any additi
reason that I can determine.
Does anyone know why the behavior of KERNEL32 API functions would behave
differently for Cygwin apps? Is there any kind of behind-the-scenes
library hooking going on that I'm unaware of? Can anyone repeat this
behavior? I'm at a loss to provide any additi
Sorry for the duplicate post; my mail filter indicated that it had
blocked my outgoing message due to the attachment. Apparently, it
didn't. :)
- Jonathan Lanier
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems
esired Posix attribute?
I'm happy to run any kind of test or diagnostic on my machine to help
narrow down the problem; unfortunately, since I am in a production
environment, I'm very limited in what I can do with the CIFS server.
- Jonathan Lanier
--
Unsubscribe info: http://
away if I
can help it. I was kind of hoping someone here might have some idea
what was going on with the internals of Cygwin/WinXP that might provide
a more direct approach at solving the problem. But if it comes to that,
then yes, I could try it.
- Jonathan Lanier
-Original Message-
F
Um, I did both on my first post yesterday. :)
- Jonathan Lanier
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Larry Hall (Cygwin)
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 6:25 PM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: 1.5.21-1: CIFS symlinks on network share
vert to the older
version of Cygwin that works and progress forward through the
cygwin1.dll history until I can determine when it breaks. I probably
will not be able to get to that until the weekend. If anyone could
direct me to an ftp or http archive of the older Cygwin distributions
mentation so maybe they haven't encountered this
yet?
If anyone who knows more about this than I do can chime in, it would be
much appreciated. Also, as I stated before, I'm more than happy to help
test to fix the problem (though I'm pretty sure the fix is simply to
remove tha
> On Feb 1 18:06, Jonathan Lanier wrote:
>> Newer versions of Cygwin appear to be incompatible with Windows
>> network shares on CIFS servers. This incompatibility arises due to
>> the fact that the Windows OS seems to return unexpected values for
>> file/direct
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 11:05:18AM -0800, Jonathan Lanier wrote:
>> Any comments from NetApp? Doesn't, like, Christopher Faylor work for
>> them, or something? :) I've been told that they troll here...
>
> I work for them but I'm neither a troll nor am I
must be doing something very weird under the hood...
We've opened a ticket with NetApp and I think they're going to look into
this for a more permanent fix (fingers crossed).
- Jonathan Lanier
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:
in
favor of avoiding work-arounds for weird behavior (AWAFWB?) whenever
possible. One long look at the filesystem code in Cygwin was enough to
frighten me out of any delusions of adequacy involving changes to Cygwin
file I/O. I have a completely new level of respect for Cygwin at this
po
>> Yep, and it doesn't help. It's solely down to the secureshare
>> stuff not presenting through the standard NT api; it's only visible
>> by using the shell extension dll.
>>
>> (... which makes me wonder, could we possibly leverage that to do
>> some useful work for us in these situations.
13 matches
Mail list logo
