Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
The question stands: What is the reason Cygwin should provide this
obscene content?
This is not the question.
Yes, it is.
Arbitrary pronouncement, in light of this I see no flaw in my
reasoning. The content exists, it has already been provided. "Should
There is also the issue of legal risk. Is the material illegal in any
country (which would cause obvious difficulty for any user or
maintainer in such countries) and do any of these countries apply
their laws extra territorially (which might cause problems to anyone
visiting a country with an
Andrew DeFaria wrote:
Joshua Kolden wrote:
You argue that it should, because you asses some of
the content as obscene, ...
Joshua! How could continue to put forth obscene and offensive filth
onto the Internet, even as a typo! ;-)
You're only giving Gary more ammunition!
Oh shit I'
The question stands: What is the reason Cygwin should provide this obscene
content?
This is not the question. Cygwin already provides the content.
Therefore the question is: should it be removed? That is to take action
beyond that which is already available to the user. Those actions being
This is a general poll on several e.mail lists to see if anyone can help
apologies if it is slightly off topic.
We are trying to create a uniform development environment for Linux and
windows based on the Intel compiler. Everything has been setup and is
working well except for debugging. When at
PLEASE!!! For the love of all that is holly can the lead developer of
the setup app please make it resizable!!!
Render unto windows what is windows'. and leave the bad habits there
too.
Thanks,
j
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://c
6 matches
Mail list logo
