I tried disabling everything I could for Symantic, short of uninstalling
it from my system (which I think my IT department would not allow). I
then did a rebaseall and tried again and got the same fork errors.
I do not believe that I have any other software on my machine from the
BLODA (which I
(I don't think my first message went through so I'm trying again)
Hi there,
I have a windows 7 Professional 64 bit machine. I am trying to compile a
simple hello world program and am getting fork errors.
I have tried rebaseall, increasing the size of the Windows SharedSection in the
registry
> And adding GPG as a package should be easy. There is already vounteer
> binary downloads 'out there'. You just need to merge tehir build recipe
> and patchs and the volunteer maintainer instructions.
My understanding is that the official Windows binaries for GnuPG are
built on Linux using a cro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>That's it. But without that I will not sign setup.exe. Just like I
> > didn't compress it until UPX became a package :].
OK. I was hoping that you might treat this as a post-build
distribution step, and might allow the use of non-Cygwin tools
(much
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
From: "Charles Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Currently, setup.ini contains md5 hashes for each tarball. The released
> version of setup.exe successfully ignores those md5's, but the HEAD will
Doh! I should have noticed that. That's great!
If the
Are signatures available for the setup program, or for the packages it
downloads?
RPM uses GPG signatures, but I can't find anything comparable for the Cygwin
binaries. Even just a list of hashes would be worthwhile (ideally vended from
a secure Cygwin/Redhat web page) to verify that a mirror (or
6 matches
Mail list logo