Hi there,
On Mon, 2021-09-06 at 14:40 -0400, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > No, wait. I get what you say. The optimzation settings of the test
> > case should have no influence on the code inside the DLL. That
> > doesn't
> > make sense for sure. However, I ran the testcase under GDB, I
Hi Corinna,
On Thu, 2020-08-20 at 14:50 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> No, it won't work as expected, as you can see from the discussion in
>
> this thread. Some internal work would be required.
OK. So even with no file actions and spawn atributes, it still would
break things.
What kind of
Hi Corinna,
> spawn alone doesn't cut it, due to the requirement to support the
> additional file actions and spawn atributes POSIX defines. This
> would require a revamp of Cygwin's spawn functionality, which is
> already quite complicated. So this is something I'm only willing
> to do in
Hi all,
On Fri, 2020-07-31 at 10:10 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Oh well. I did a quick test with your new testcase (thanks for
> that!)
> and it seems to be a bit more complicated than I anticipated
> yesterday.
> The parent-child relationship between the processes is broken. I
> have
> to
On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 08:35 -0600, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2020-04-15 04:44, Mail Delivery System via Cygwin wrote:
> > This is the mail system at host sourceware.org.
> > I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
> > be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
Hi Mike,
> Is it possible use Cygwin to run an autotools 'configure' script but
> have the compiler be MSVC?
Yeah, sure, i have done this in the past.
"./configure CC=cl.exe" should get you going as far as i remember. Make
sure your MS tools are in your PATH.
There are limitations though, as
On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 10:18 +0200, Peter Dons Tychsen wrote:
> OK thanks,
>
> I will keep an eye out for them :-)
>
> Thanks,
>
> /pedro
And sorry for the top post. I have just now slapped myself as
punishment :-).
/pedro
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
OK thanks,
I will keep an eye out for them :-)
Thanks,
/pedro
On Tue, 2019-10-22 at 19:40 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 22 19:11, donpedro.tdcadsl.dk via cygwin wrote:
> > Hello all.
> >
> > There does not appear to be any snaps any more at:
> > https://cygwin.com/snapshots/
> >
Hi Ken,
> I think you're probably right. The use of FE_NNF in execvp* was
> introduced in
> commit 6d63272b. I suspect it was just an oversight that the spawvp*
> functions
> weren't changed in the same way. I'll send a patch to the cygwin-
> patches list
> to fix this. When Corinna
9 matches
Mail list logo
