Solved, sort of: dumper 1.10 not giving expected stack trace in gdb

2004-01-04 Thread Robert Baruch
Hi all, I have a suboptimal solution for getting a good stack trace in gdb. First, DO NOT use dumper as the error_start program. Set CYGWIN='error_start=C:\windows-path-to-gdb\gdb.exe'. When an abort occurs, gdb will start. Next, do info thread to find all the threads. Chances are the aborted

Re: help: dumper 1.10 not giving expected stack trace in gdb

2004-01-01 Thread Robert Baruch
I think I'm completely screwed. There doesn't seem to be any way to get a backtrace if a program does an abort. Here's the stack dump from before, with asterisks marking what are supposed to be valid frames. Again, the double-star marks the innermost frame as reported by t.exe.stackdump.

Re: help: dumper 1.10 not giving expected stack trace in gdb

2003-12-31 Thread Robert Baruch
Christopher Faylor wrote: It's an unfortunate side effect of the way dumper works. The dumping process is paused waiting for a debugger (in this case dumper.exe) to connect. The routine that is used to pause is frameless. The stack is still available for inspection via something like 'x/100x

help: dumper 1.10 not giving expected stack trace in gdb

2003-12-30 Thread Robert Baruch
Hi all, I've compiled a simple C program, t.c, via gcc-3.3.1, with -g: #include stdio.h int main(void) { abort(); } I've set CYGWIN='error_start=C:\cygwin\bin\dumper.exe'. So when I run the program, abort causes dumper to run, and I end up with a t.exe.stackdump file and a t.exe.core file.

Re: help: dumper 1.10 not giving expected stack trace in gdb

2003-12-30 Thread Robert Baruch
Igor Pechtchanski wrote: If I'm reading the code correctly, the stackdump file is generated from the failed thread. The core file contains the information about all threads, with no info on what the current (failed) one is. So, try running 'info threads' in gdb, and then switch to each thread