On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 19:09, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
*Updated* packages are trusted by default. They can be uploaded w/o
review.
I'll upload updates if notified here. Oh, once a day, so allow 24 hr
turnaround :}
Rob
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 20:36, Chris January wrote:
*Updated* packages are trusted by default. They can be uploaded w/o
review.
Not being funny, but this probably shouldn't be the case. I could easily
spoof some mail headers and get a compromised binary uploaded. I think there
should
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 21:11, Chris January wrote:
*Updated* packages are trusted by default. They can be uploaded w/o
review.
Not being funny, but this probably shouldn't be the case. I could easily
spoof some mail headers and get a compromised binary uploaded.
Then I suggest
On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 21:54, Lapo Luchini wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was thinking abut it (again)... but a little search avoided me a
duplicate proposal... So I will answer to latest messages I can find
about it, as I'm very interested in the thing.
- From
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 21:34, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
It's still Corinna.
Doh. I'm thumb fingered at the moment, I think my keyboard (which is new
when I got a devel pc) doesn't agree with me. Sorry!
the list as a ready-to-upload package is indeed from the maintainer.
Thats about it.
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 23:18, Lapo Luchini wrote:
2) cygwin has a implicitly trusted key, whose private key is used by
CGF, Corinna, or any central cygwin trusted member
I don't think we want an implicitly trusted key. We do need a central
key of sorts, but that is different because the user
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 23:36, Morrison, John wrote:
I think, if this key thing goes ahead, somebody is going to
have to come up with a *very* detailed method of getting a
key and signing things with regards to cygwin stuff. Making
a package for cygwin _is_ not easy for people who grew up
in
approach and consistently sign their emails. YMMV.
yes, but I need your public key to verify that you are really YOU.
Where did you put your public key, I tried some keyservers but couldn't
find you. Many Robert Collins, but not with [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Ah yes, I had not uploaded a recent
On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 09:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24 Sep, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
[...]
One further note, X11 packages should be ITP'd on the Cygwin/XFree
mailing list rather then cygwin-apps.
Thanks for all that good info, Nicholas. I'll have a go.
I guess if I did see
On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 22:34, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
See
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/functions/pthread_key_create.html
I do not think that we should support more than one iterations at the
moment. This seems to be a rather new addition to the pthread
specification.
Hmm, I
On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 22:36, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
2002-09-23 Thomas Pfaff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* thread.cc (MTinterface::fixup_after_fork): Reset threadcount to
1 after fork.
Why do we need this? MTinterface::Init is also called after fork, and
sets threadcount to 1.
Rob
On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 22:45, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
I said that my implementation works similar as critical sections (or Chris
mutos).
Oh, I must have misread. Sorry.
Rob
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 22:13, Max Bowsher wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
Much better. Please supply as a attachment, along with a changelog.
Will do.
Cool, Thanks.
OK. It was a (not so good) attempt at a performance optimization.
Done too early :].
+ setString, String::caseless
On Mon, 2002-09-23 at 02:40, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Robert Collins has vowed to fix this problem this weekend. Until then,
however, I have commented out the code in question.
Thatsa ctually a good solution for now. Thoams suggested his approach
did the same thing, but I've reviewed
On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 03:44, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 05:58:27PM +0100, John Morrison wrote:
Hi All,
Rob would *really* like to get this functionality out of setup...
It's easy enough for Rob to coordinate. He just has to upload your
tools and update setup.exe.
On Sat, 2002-07-20 at 14:25, Harry Johnston wrote:
At 03:01 PM 02/07/19, Robert Collins wrote:
It is conventional for setup wizards to have a different caption on each
Here 'tis. I'm not familiar with CVS, but I think I did it right - if not,
let me know!
Harry.
It was just fine
On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 19:12, Max Bowsher wrote:
CVSROOT: /cvs/cygwin-apps
Module name: setup
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-09-21 01:59:30
Modified files:
. : Makefile.in aclocal.m4 configure
cfgaux : depcomp ltmain.sh
Log message:
current generated
On Tue, 2002-07-23 at 15:49, Harry Johnston wrote:
Hi,
Attached are diffs to provide a basic unattended mode in setup.exe. Let me
know if they need to be in a different format, or if I should be using CVS
(I might need a hint or two though).
Applied. For the record, please supply a
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 00:01, Max Bowsher wrote:
Yes, I remember, but what is the difference between having to bootstrap _some_
of setup, and having to bootstrap _all_ of setup ?
Good, then you'll understand I don't want to go through that again right
now.
You are welcome to go through it
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 00:57, Max Bowsher wrote:
Take 2. I'm confident about everything but my const qualifiers on
packagemeta::getReadableCategoryList ().
Please pay close attention to them. Thanks.
Much better. Please supply as a attachment, along with a changelog.
Also, I've made some
On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 20:17, Soren A wrote:
A revised Cygwin home page (reflecting the change I suggested):
http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin/
Soren, you should submit the changes as a diff for starters.
Secondly, if at all possible, submit a change against the website CVS.
Rob
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 03:41, Soren A wrote:
Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
1032604599.10933.113.camel@lifelesswks:">news:1032604599.10933.113.camel@lifelesswks:
Soren, you should submit the changes as a diff for starters.
Secondly, if at all possible, submit a change
On Sun, 2002-09-22 at 08:36, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Rob,
Have you been able to get it to compile with gcc-3.2?
No. I haven't even tried yet.
Rob
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 22:43, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 19:34, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
Thomas, the patch is incomplete.
pthread_cond::TimedWait needs updating as well...
Yup, but it seems that this was broken on NT before i
On Sat, 2002-08-17 at 06:55, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
Pthread key destructor handling revised. IMHO it does not make sense to
handle two lists with keys, one with all keys, one with its destructors.
The destructors are now part of the key class.
I agree with the duplication of code. This is one
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 23:06, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
If you want to work around this you must use a mutex to protect the entire
list.
Or: don't delete foo; the keys, instead foo-deleteme();
pthread_key::pthread_key(){
inuse_count = 1;
}
pthread_key::deleteme() {
On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 05:53, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 02:45:45PM -0500, Richardson, Tony wrote:
I guess that you could untar everything appropriately, but you'd need
to run the post-install scripts.
Um. I think this is a really simple request. We've seen it more
On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 16:42, Antonio wrote:
Hello from Spain:
I´m writting because i have a problem with Cygwin. I have installed the full
Excalibur Nios Development installation. When i try to execute Nios SDK
Shell from Excalibur Nios 2.0 label, a DOS cmd returns several messages as
On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 11:22, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
[snip]
Can we alter the website?
'Install cygwin now'
How do I add or remove packages?
'Add or remove pacakges now'
How do I install Cygwin in the first place?
From the website. It at least gives us a canonical answer.
On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 11:43, Christopher Faylor wrote:
How about
put food in your mouth now!
move your jaws now!
swallow masticated food now!
digest food now!
wipe your ass now!
The possibilities are endless.
I'll take that as a no. The install-extra-package
On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 12:05, Bruce Alderson wrote:
Your suggestion came out fine. It has just been suggested hundreds of
times in the past.
Ah, I've been lurking on the list for ages - but not noticed the
request. Apologies.
Anyway, would it be worth submitting a patch for the
On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 21:29, Max Bowsher wrote:
Here is a patch for setup.
IniDBBuilderPackage.cc: Fix DEBUG mode
Hunk 1: Remove a DEBUG message box which otherwise pops up once per package
during ini parsing, thus rendering DEBUG unusable.
This stays for now. It's there because it was
On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 22:20, Max Bowsher wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 21:29, Max Bowsher wrote:
Here is a patch for setup.
IniDBBuilderPackage.cc: Fix DEBUG mode
Hunk 1: Remove a DEBUG message box which otherwise pops up once per package
during ini parsing
On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 01:34, Max Bowsher wrote:
In the snapshot, sort order is alphabetically by package name.
In CVS HEAD, sort order is by installed/not installed, followed by
alphabetically by package name.
Is this intentional? I could not find a ChangeLog entry saying so.
It's a work
On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 18:48, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
I have attached a small source file for testing.
Thanks. I've commited my reworked version.
My main goal was to get a working threaded perl, so this was the reference
source for the final testing. With all patches applied (and the changed
On Sat, 2002-08-17 at 06:32, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
Some small fixes in the pthread key handling.
-1020,16 +1020,27 pthread_key::~pthread_key ()
int
pthread_key::set (const void *value)
{
- /*the OS function doesn't perform error checking */
- TlsSetValue (dwTlsIndex, (void *)
On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 19:23, Paul Johnston wrote:
Hi,
/etc/hosts - ${SYSTEMROOT}/system32/drivers/etc/hosts
So, like all great ideas, all that it needs is an actual patch to make
it happen.
Ok, I will have a go at this. As it involves mods to the setup program, I'm
going to move
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 18:42, Morrison, John wrote:
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 03:44, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 05:58:27PM +0100, John Morrison wrote:
Hi All,
Rob would *really* like to get this functionality out
On Sun, 2002-09-01 at 03:44, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 05:58:27PM +0100, John Morrison wrote:
Hi All,
Rob would *really* like to get this functionality out of setup...
It's easy enough for Rob to coordinate. He just has to upload your
tools and update setup.exe.
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 01:44, Jason Tishler wrote:
make clobber -- for the bandwidth challenged, next time?
oopsee. :}.
There were a few logic flaws that made it not work for me.
Huh? Do you mean the RebaseConfigParser::parseFoo diffs? I couldn't
find any other likely candidates.
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 02:36, Jason Tishler wrote:
Rob,
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:51:55AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 01:44, Jason Tishler wrote:
Huh? Do you mean the RebaseConfigParser::parseFoo diffs?
The missing return true from the parser submethods
On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 22:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hmm, perhaps it *is* better to bump the version?!?
Yes.
Rob
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 00:11, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 00:02, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Well that may be the way it should be, but the reality of the situation
is this:
Check the source luke.
Source != Reality
Ha!. Source
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 00:34, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
What I mean to say is that, despite one's best efforts, compiled source
doesn't always behave as one had intended. Of course it will act as it
is written, it just may not seem apparent that the way it acts
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 12:41, Gareth Pearce wrote:
alphabetical order can still obviously screw this up anyway, no way to work
this perfectly until the full versioned dependency set comes in -
pre-removal-depends post-install-depends ... etc.
That level of depends tracking is not needed.
On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 09:02, Len Giambrone wrote:
I would dearly love to see setup able to be run fully from the command line.
In the process of determining how to use the tools in libgetopt++ to do this,
I came across this in the archives:
On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 11:26, Len Giambrone wrote:
Great. It seems he also forgot to mention another option he added:
-r --no-replaceonreboot
Prevent the replacement of an in-use file on reboot.
Is there an easy way to write a help/usage command other than searching
through the
On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 00:48, Jason Tishler wrote:
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 05:46:32PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
I know its supposed to be part of setup.exe, but with Rob being
indefinately tied up, I think this is the most prudent step at this
point.
Actually, I'm suppose to be
On Sat, 2002-08-10 at 01:09, Jason Tishler wrote:
Rob,
On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 12:39:39AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
On Fri, 2002-08-09 at 00:48, Jason Tishler wrote:
Do others share Nicholas's views on this issue?
I'm completely impartial. Well nearly: I think that a separate
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 23:39, Jason Tishler wrote:
But seriously, thank you *very* much for taking the time to explain how
the Builder pattern really does fit this application. Some of what you
said was bouncing around inside of my head, but you brought order to the
chaos. I will run (well,
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 00:52, John Morrison wrote:
There's now a 1.0-2. Added a little more functionality and
lots more comments.
I've not recieved much feedback wrt this. Come on folks -
what do you think?
I think we should get the bare minimal functionality *released*, and
then debate
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 11:50, Danny Smith wrote:
--- Danny Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have modified the
Adriano dos Santos Fernandes patchset somewhat so that
it
can be used with both cygwin and mingw
In absence of feedback on this patch from cygwin developers I will modify so
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 13:17, Danny Smith wrote:
Lastly, wouldn't SEH be a feasible alternative (if the ReactOS work is
usable).
my concern with ReactOS SEH is that is has Borland license uncertainties.
Please follow up privately - I think we are off topic now :}. I really
need to
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 11:02, Hack Kampbjørn wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 11:27:06PM +0200, Hack Kampbj?rn wrote:
What about depending on all the programs called in the scripts like:
# cp, mkdir - fileutils
# hostname, id - sh-utils
# sh - ash
# tr -
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 12:14, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 12:02:49PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
so it should depend on it - even though the package is there to help
bash.
ash also accesses /etc/profile. So we'd be introducing a circular
dependency. Does every
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 22:55, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Earnie,
The reply-to address for the mailing list is now [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In light of this, maybe you should reevaluate whether your default
action should be to hit ``reply'' or ``reply-to-all''.
It doesn't appear to be. I thought
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 23:03, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Oops, clicked the wrong message. The ones I have been testing over the
last few days all had the reply-to set :)
I had been testing messages from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I thought that
one had the reply-to set as well... was I again just
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 21:18, John Morrison wrote:
After (much ;) discussion with Rob here's the first 'release' of the
profile package.
I'm for inclusion of these packages - they allow setup to become
somewhat simpler.
Thanks John!
Rob
msg03505/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
'nuff said.
msg03492/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 20:14, David Starks-Browning wrote:
On 25 Jul 02, in cygwin-xfree, Robert Collins writes:
I've been trying for *ages* to get /etc/profile to be an external file.
All' it needs is *someone* willing to be a package maintainer for it.
Hardly an onerous role, yet no one
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 20:40, Morrison, John wrote:
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 20:14, David Starks-Browning wrote:
On 25 Jul 02, in cygwin-xfree, Robert Collins writes:
I've been trying for *ages* to get /etc/profile to be an
external
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 11:20, Harold Hunt wrote:
Jehan,
Excellent summarization of the thread regarding how we can add
/usr/X11R6/bin to the path.
Looks like we had Dave Cook and Robert Collins discussing the best way to do
things but then the thread died.
I don't really think that I
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 20:14, David Starks-Browning wrote:
On 25 Jul 02, in cygwin-xfree, Robert Collins writes:
I've been trying for *ages* to get /etc/profile to be an external file.
All' it needs is *someone* willing to be a package maintainer for it.
Hardly an onerous role, yet no one
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 20:40, Morrison, John wrote:
From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 20:14, David Starks-Browning wrote:
On 25 Jul 02, in cygwin-xfree, Robert Collins writes:
I've been trying for *ages* to get /etc/profile to be an
external
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 22:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Are you sure that we don't get licensing issues here? AFAIK, Qt is
(roughly) only free when running on a free OS. Basically we're
still running on Windows...
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/licensing/
Summary, 2.2 and later is QPL
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 01:47, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Robert, please remove md5sum from your dpkg package.
Thanks,
cgf
Done. OH, and OOOPS!
Rob
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 02:28, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 01:52:20AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 01:47, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Robert, please remove md5sum from your dpkg package.
Thanks,
Done. OH, and OOOPS!
Wow. Quick response
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 05:29, 佐藤 龍之介 wrote:
Hi,
I'm interested in becoming new package maintainer for doxygen,
so, I read Contributors Guide,and made
setup.hint,src-package,bin-package.
Please tell me what I should do next.
Who do I send these files to?
Do what Nicholas suggested with
On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 05:43, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
...Also, have you
considiered using qt2-cygwin for doxywizard? [ see
http://kde-cygwin.sourceforge.net ]
I don't think anything packaged in the Net Distribution should depend on
an outside site. That will cause waaay to many support requests
===
- Original Message -
From: Harry Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 3:49 PM
Subject: Diffs for setup.exe unattended mode
Hi,
Attached are diffs to provide a basic unattended mode in setup.exe.
Let me
know if they need to be in a
===
- Original Message -
From: Nick THOMPSON [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cygwin-xfree Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:22 PM
Subject: X via SSH (was: New (Delphi) xlauncher)
What I could do with is a mode that allows an X session to be setup
through an SSH
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nicholas Wourms
Sent: Tuesday, 23 July 2002 1:36 AM
Harold,
Who's to say that ReactOS won't have a registry?
1) ReactOS has a registry, and an editor.
2) ReactOS is targeting binary
The 'libxml2' package has been updated. Libxml2 is a C
library that allows programs to manipulate XML data.
This is the first release to include the python bindings on cygwin.
Rob
To update your installation, click on the Install Cygwin now link
on the http://cygwin.com/ web page. This
Thanks Norman, these where useful.
However, I'm still having trouble getting the 2.4.23 libxml2 to link
against python.
I'd like to offer it with python - perhaps you and gerrit can confirm my
trouble?
I'll send over the patch and build script in private email if you are
interested.
Cheers,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Sent: Thursday, 18 July 2002 7:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Guile-1.5.6-4 available for review/upload
Dr. Volker Zell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
janneke
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Sent: Thursday, 18 July 2002 8:09 PM
As noticed, this has been discused on cygwin-apps. As an addendum,
I'm working to provide cross-compile setup as mknetrel scripts, but
Now this is probably going to start a huge email wave. So I'll start by
making some key points:
1) Setup does not support dpkg or rpm yet, so this package is -not-
meant to interoperate with setup.exe.
(*)
2) I'm not trying to 'race' Nicholas's rpm efforts. I don't think we
should -ever- place
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Sent: Thursday, 18 July 2002 9:13 PM
Btw, are these serious enough to warrant another upload, or do we wait
a few days to gather more bugs? If so, I've made a -5 bugfix release
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Sent: Thursday, 18 July 2002 9:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Concise Instructions for Doing a gcc
Cross-Compile in CYGWIN for FreeBSD
Robert Collins [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Wourms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 18 July 2002 9:49 PM
To: Robert Collins
2) I'm not trying to 'race' Nicholas's rpm efforts. I don't think we
should -ever- place cygwin maintainers in a position where they must
have either dpkg
I think it would be nice to add configuration dialogs for packages to
setup.exe.
i.e. when installing ssh, ask the user whether to configure sshd or not.
The requirements are:
* It must be capable of being driven textually - for future command line
setup.exe installs.
* It must be capable of
===
- Original Message -
From: Harry Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 12:04 PM
Subject: setup.exe window captions
Hi,
It is conventional for setup wizards to have a different caption on
each
page of the property sheet, but the cygwin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nicholas Wourms
Sent: Wednesday, 17 July 2002 10:09 PM
To: Jason Tishler
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: rebase problem for cygcurl-2.dll still existing?!
Jason Tishler wrote:
Is that a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Juan José
Andrés Gutiérrez
Sent: Wednesday, 17 July 2002 9:55 PM
As I can use these DLL in a program written with Visual C++?
1) Dlls are not libs. Conversion is not guaranteed.
2) These
-Original Message-
From: Juan José Andrés Gutiérrez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 17 July 2002 10:04 PM
To: Robert Collins
Subject: Re: Problems with MSVC6.0
I need to use Visual C++ 6.0 because I'm making an ActiveX.
False. G++ can produce ActiveX objects
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Juan José
Andrés Gutiérrez
Sent: Wednesday, 17 July 2002 11:51 PM
To: Robert Collins
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problems with MSVC6.0
I need a explanation, please. If I load
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nicholas Wourms
Sent: Tuesday, 16 July 2002 3:04 AM
To: cygx
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Installation Classes for setup.exe [was RE:
LibICE.DLL is a BIG problem]
Hi,
Instead of
Title: Message
Some
stripped .dll's corrupt on rebase, others don't.
What
I'm wondering is if the recent thread about COFF file format and section sizes
has anything to do with the rebase corruption that occurs?
Rob
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nicholas Wourms
Sent: Tuesday, 16 July 2002 3:04 AM
To: cygx
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Installation Classes for setup.exe [was RE:
LibICE.DLL is a BIG problem]
Hi,
Instead of
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lapo Luchini
Sent: Sunday, 14 July 2002 7:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]:CygWin-Apps
OK, I prepared the package using aclocal libtoolize
--force at the
beginning of the conf
- Original Message -
From: Tim Thomson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rasjid Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: cygwin-xfree Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have been playing with wxWindows with C++.
Why not just code to the Win32 API? It's not that hard, not for a trivial
launcher.
wxWindows is a
- Original Message -
From: Tim Thomson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cygx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 3:39 PM
Subject: RE: New xlauncher (was: Re: Success with Java prog in XFree)
On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 16:33, Harold Hunt wrote:
For future reference, the xlauncher-style
What about
ldesc: programs to convert GIF images
These are some programs that use libungif to convert images.
The libungif library is a specially modified version of giflib which
is free of the Unisys LZW patent. It can read all GIFs, but only
write uncompressed GIFs.
(Courtesy of
If you run setup under DebugView, or a similar tool, is any output
created?
Can you get me a stackdump?
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nicholas Wourms
Sent: Sunday, 14 July 2002 8:46 AM
To: Cygwin-Apps
Subject:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Harold L Hunt
Sent: Saturday, 13 July 2002 6:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug in startxwin.bat after installing with
setup.exe in win98SE
Jehan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Harold
-Original Message-
From: Jehan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, 14 July 2002 8:18 AM
To: Robert Collins
Subject: Re: Bug in startxwin.bat after installing with
setup.exe in win98SE
Robert Collins wrote:
Nope, it's also generated from mount information. Cygwin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Thomas Chadwick
I hate to jump into the middle of a religious argument (which this is
turning out to be) but it seems to me that a plausible
solution would be to
urge the maintainers of the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nicholas Wourms
Sent: Sunday, 14 July 2002 10:29 AM
Chuck,
For crying out loud, 95% of the installers out there create
shortcuts for
the user in the startmenu and on the desktop. Why is this
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Wourms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, 14 July 2002 10:57 AM
To: Jehan Bing
...
No he isn't. There are two ways that someone will interface
with Cygwin,
via Console or via X11. The other apps you mention are Console apps,
therefore
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nicholas Wourms
Sent: Sunday, 14 July 2002 11:09 AM
Robert,
I'll have none of this debian talk. You know full well that
I am working
very hard to get rpm-4.1 ready for inclusion into the
901 - 1000 of 2024 matches
Mail list logo
