On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:57:03 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I'll try to be clearer. We obviously know how to scan an executable for
> dependent DLLs since cygcheck does it already (and actually cygwin
> itself does this) but we are not going to be modifying ldd to deal with
> the case of
sorry about the extra question marks my last post. I'm not sure what caused
them. Yahoo's email interface didn't show them when it was sent, and they
don't appear in the copy of the message in my Sent folder. Weird. (of course,
now this post will probably end up having them also :-D )
--
P
On Mar 6 20:51, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 03:53:34PM -0800, cppjavaperl wrote:
> > > On Feb 24 12:56, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >
> > > On Feb 23 15:03, cppjavaperl wrote:
> > > > This was discovered in cygwin-1.7.10-1.
&g
> On Feb 24 12:56, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> On Feb 23 15:03, cppjavaperl wrote:
> > This was discovered in cygwin-1.7.10-1.
> >
> > If you run 'ldd' against an executable, and the executable has
> > dependent DLLs which do *not* have execute permissi
This was discovered in cygwin-1.7.10-1.
If you run 'ldd' against an executable, and the executable has dependent DLLs
which do *not* have execute permissions, ldd's output stops when it reaches the
offending dependent DLL, and reports no further information. ldd does not give
an error message,
5 matches
Mail list logo
