Re: "Best" way to build a DLL?

2002-02-15 Thread Jason Tishler
Gerald, On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 03:52:28PM -0500, Gerald S. Williams wrote: > Presumably, the distutils package sets this automatically, ... Yes it does. Jason -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation:

RE: "Best" way to build a DLL?

2002-02-15 Thread Gerald S. Williams
Thanks for the nudge. After seeing your mail, I poked around pyconfig.h and found the USE_DL_IMPORT define. Anyway, if you're linking to Cygwin Python, -DUSE_DL_IMPORT on the gcc line eliminates those informational "Warnings", at least from the Python library. Presumably, the distutils package se

Re: "Best" way to build a DLL?

2002-02-15 Thread Jason Tishler
Chuck, On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 01:52:47PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > Wrong. Those "warnings" are really just informational messages. The > python library exports *variables* as well as functions. Your DLL > probably only exports funtions. DATA exports are very very tricky; > there is a

Re: "Best" way to build a DLL?

2002-02-10 Thread Charles Wilson
Take a look at the new examples in the dllhelpers. I've added four new examples for building DLLs using libtool and friends. --Chuck Nousiainen wrote: > This seems to be the most complicated thing .. building a DLL file. So, > what is the best and recommended way to do the job using recent

"Best" way to build a DLL?

2002-02-09 Thread Nousiainen
This seems to be the most complicated thing .. building a DLL file. So, what is the best and recommended way to do the job using recent cygwin tools? I've read autobook (http://sources.redhat.com/autobook/autobook/autobook_toc.html) and it gives some good advice (I'm using autotools in my projec