Re: [1.7] cygwin2 performance issue during compilation with autotools

2009-12-05 Thread kiorky
I really would have love to investigate why it is slow; but atm, i have no more ideas ... For the only remark done far from now, i don't have any duplicates in PATH but cygcheck must be bugged or it finds informations setted elsewhere than in environment and that i'm not aware of. The install is c

Re: [1.7] cygwin2 performance issue during compilation with autotools

2009-12-04 Thread kiorky
Maybe is there a bug in cygcheck ? Maybe there are others ways that looking in env['PATH'] to construct your "Pathes check" that i am not aware ? Maybe PATH is not related to performance issues, afterall... But for the moment, and my current knowledge, i don't see any duplicates in the $PATH varia

Re: [1.7] cygwin2 performance issue during compilation with autotools

2009-12-03 Thread kiorky
mak...@apem3 ~ $ echo $PATH /cygdrive/e/minitage2/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/cygdrive/e/Subversion/bin:/cygdrive/e/OpenLDAP/CD SSilver/:/cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/system32:/cygdrive/c/WINDOWS:/cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/System32/Wbem:/cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/system32 /WindowsPowerShell/v1.0:/cygd

Re: [1.7] cygwin2 performance issue during compilation with autotools

2009-12-03 Thread kiorky
But there is no reason for that : >> E:\cygwin2\bin >> E:\cygwin2\bin ... It's a default install ... Peter Rosin a écrit : > Den 2009-12-03 12:04 skrev kiorky: >> Are there others ways i an investigate ? >> > > As far as I can tell, you never did clear out the duplicates from your > path

Re: [1.7] cygwin2 performance issue during compilation with autotools

2009-12-03 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2009-12-03 12:04 skrev kiorky: Are there others ways i an investigate ? As far as I can tell, you never did clear out the duplicates from your path. From 2nd instance of 2.out: Path: E:\cygwin2\usr\local\bin E:\cygwin2\bin E:\cygwin2\bin E:\cygwin2\usr\X11R6\bi

Re: [1.7] cygwin2 performance issue during compilation with autotools

2009-12-03 Thread kiorky
Are there others ways i an investigate ? -- Cordialement, KiOrKY GPG Key FingerPrint: 0x1A1194B7681112AF signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [1.7] cygwin2 performance issue during compilation with autotools

2009-12-02 Thread kiorky
Dave Korn a écrit : > kiorky wrote: > > Look, this is a completely wacky and random WAG, and it's not likely to Not worth to try it ;) > work, but... try turning off the shell icon overlays in the tortoisesvn > explorer shell extension, if you happen to have them turned on. Tried: real21m

Re: [1.7] cygwin2 performance issue during compilation with autotools

2009-12-02 Thread Dave Korn
kiorky wrote: > My related new 2.out, without improvments in term of performances (>20min of > compilation). Look, this is a completely wacky and random WAG, and it's not likely to work, but... try turning off the shell icon overlays in the tortoisesvn explorer shell extension, if you happen to

Re: [1.7] cygwin2 performance issue during compilation with autotools

2009-12-02 Thread kiorky
Larry Hall (Cygwin) a écrit : > Thanks. Since cygcheck for 1.5 doesn't find gcc and you have tools from > other sources installed, This is legitimate, i understand. > I have to ask, are you comparing Cygwin's 1.5 > build > tools with Cygwin's 1.7 build tools? I use only cygwin1 stuff in cygwi

Re: [1.7] cygwin2 performance issue during compilation with autotools

2009-12-01 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 06:28:47PM -0500, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: >On 12/01/2009 05:31 PM, kiorky wrote: >> Larry Hall (Cygwin) a ??crit : >> >>> Can we see *attached* cygcheck output for your 1.7 and 1.5 installs, as >> 1.out -> cygwin >> 2.out -> cygwin2 > >Thanks. Since cygcheck for 1.5 do

Re: [1.7] cygwin2 performance issue during compilation with autotools

2009-12-01 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 12/01/2009 05:31 PM, kiorky wrote: Larry Hall (Cygwin) a écrit : Can we see *attached* cygcheck output for your 1.7 and 1.5 installs, as 1.out -> cygwin 2.out -> cygwin2 Thanks. Since cygcheck for 1.5 doesn't find gcc and you have tools from other sources installed, I have to ask, are