Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: dash-0.5.5.1-2; Obsolete: ash

2011-12-03 Thread Eric Blake
On 03/05/2010 10:20 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Rounding out a (super-old) thread on my dash todo list... $ dash $ cd /c $ ls -d W* WINDOWS $ cd c:/WINDOWS cd: 3: can't cd to c:/WINDOWS Let's rule out bash vs. dash complexities, and first focus on whether cygwin1.dll might be at fault.

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: dash-0.5.5.1-2; Obsolete: ash

2010-03-05 Thread Edward Lam
Eric Blake wrote: According to Edward Lam on 1/21/2010 7:12 AM: DOS file paths and dash seems to NOT support them Huh? Give an example. dash supports DOS paths the same as bash. That is, if the : doesn't already cause other problems (as in tar), then the DOS path is handed on to native

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: dash-0.5.5.1-2; Obsolete: ash

2010-03-05 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mar 5 09:08, Edward Lam wrote: Eric Blake wrote: According to Edward Lam on 1/21/2010 7:12 AM: DOS file paths and dash seems to NOT support them Huh? Give an example. dash supports DOS paths the same as bash. That is, if the : doesn't already cause other problems (as in tar), then

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: dash-0.5.5.1-2; Obsolete: ash

2010-03-05 Thread Edward Lam
Corinna Vinschen wrote: Is that a case-sensitivity issue, perhaps? See http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-specialnames.html#pathnames-casesensitive I don't see how it is: $ dash $ cd /c $ ls -d W* WINDOWS $ cd c:/WINDOWS cd: 3: can't cd to c:/WINDOWS $ cd C:/WINDOWS cd: 4: can't cd to

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: dash-0.5.5.1-2; Obsolete: ash

2010-03-05 Thread Edward Lam
Edward Lam wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: Is that a case-sensitivity issue, perhaps? See http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-specialnames.html#pathnames-casesensitive I don't see how it is: $ dash $ cd /c $ ls -d W* WINDOWS $ cd c:/WINDOWS cd: 3: can't cd to c:/WINDOWS $ cd C:/WINDOWS

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: dash-0.5.5.1-2; Obsolete: ash

2010-03-05 Thread Edward Lam
Edward Lam wrote: Edward Lam wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: Is that a case-sensitivity issue, perhaps? See http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-specialnames.html#pathnames-casesensitive I don't see how it is: $ dash $ cd /c $ ls -d W* WINDOWS $ cd c:/WINDOWS cd: 3: can't cd to

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: dash-0.5.5.1-2; Obsolete: ash

2010-03-05 Thread Edward Lam
Corinna Vinschen wrote: Is that a case-sensitivity issue, perhaps? See http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-specialnames.html#pathnames-casesensitive And in case you missed this the first time, it works fine in bash $ bash $ cd c:/ $ pwd /c $ export FOO=c:/windows $ cd $FOO $ pwd

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: dash-0.5.5.1-2; Obsolete: ash

2010-03-05 Thread Eric Blake
According to Edward Lam on 3/5/2010 9:55 AM: Corinna Vinschen wrote: Is that a case-sensitivity issue, perhaps? See http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-specialnames.html#pathnames-casesensitive I don't see how it is: $ dash $ cd /c $ ls -d W* WINDOWS $ cd c:/WINDOWS cd: 3: can't

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: dash-0.5.5.1-2; Obsolete: ash

2010-03-05 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mar 5 10:10, Eric Blake wrote: According to Edward Lam on 3/5/2010 9:55 AM: Corinna Vinschen wrote: Is that a case-sensitivity issue, perhaps? See http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-specialnames.html#pathnames-casesensitive I don't see how it is: $ dash $ cd /c $ ls

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: dash-0.5.5.1-2; Obsolete: ash

2010-03-05 Thread Edward Lam
Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Mar 5 10:10, Eric Blake wrote: Let's rule out bash vs. dash complexities, and first focus on whether cygwin1.dll might be at fault. Untested code: #include unistd.h #include stdio.h #include string.h #include errno.h int main(int argc, char**argv) { int e =

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: dash-0.5.5.1-2; Obsolete: ash

2010-01-21 Thread Edward Lam
Eric Blake wrote: The package dash has been upgraded to 0.5.5.1-2 for those using cygwin 1.7, simultaneously replacing dash-0.5.5.1-1 and ash-20040127-4. The ash package is now obsolete; ash.exe is provided by the dash package. I know I'm slow but I just updated to this cygwin change and

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: dash-0.5.5.1-2; Obsolete: ash

2010-01-21 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 09:12:25AM -0500, Edward Lam wrote: Eric Blake wrote: The package dash has been upgraded to 0.5.5.1-2 for those using cygwin 1.7, simultaneously replacing dash-0.5.5.1-1 and ash-20040127-4. The ash package is now obsolete; ash.exe is provided by the dash package. I

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: dash-0.5.5.1-2; Obsolete: ash

2010-01-21 Thread Eric Blake
According to Edward Lam on 1/21/2010 7:12 AM: DOS file paths and dash seems to NOT support them Huh? Give an example. dash supports DOS paths the same as bash. That is, if the : doesn't already cause other problems (as in tar), then the DOS path is handed on to native windows (and you get the

[ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: dash-0.5.5.1-2; Obsolete: ash

2009-07-14 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The package dash has been upgraded to 0.5.5.1-2 for those using cygwin 1.7, simultaneously replacing dash-0.5.5.1-1 and ash-20040127-4. The ash package is now obsolete; ash.exe is provided by the dash package. NEWS: = This is a minor patch

GOLD STAR! (was Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: dash-0.5.5.1-2; Obsolete: ash)

2009-07-14 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Wohooo! On Jul 14 06:29, Eric Blake wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The package dash has been upgraded to 0.5.5.1-2 for those using cygwin 1.7, simultaneously replacing dash-0.5.5.1-1 and ash-20040127-4. The ash package is now obsolete; ash.exe is provided by the dash