On Jan 14 10:17, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 13 12:48, random user wrote:
> > >> It's a bit late now to change how Cygwin constructs and evaluates ACLs.
> >
> > Sorry, with the holidays and other issues it wasn't possible for me to
> > look at the test drops earlier.
>
> We're testing this C
On Jan 13 12:48, random user wrote:
> >> It's a bit late now to change how Cygwin constructs and evaluates ACLs.
>
> Sorry, with the holidays and other issues it wasn't possible for me to
> look at the test drops earlier.
We're testing this Cygwin change for four(!) months now. I release
the fir
>> It's a bit late now to change how Cygwin constructs and evaluates ACLs.
Sorry, with the holidays and other issues it wasn't possible for me to
look at the test drops earlier.
Going production with a new Cygwin NTFS ACL layout incompatible with
NTFS-3g's already-existing layout would seem a lon
On Jan 12 22:17, random user wrote:
> Something I wasn't aware of at the time of our prior discussion is
> that the Linux NTFS-3g driver already supports Linux extended ACLs
> on NTFS. This is discussed at
>
> http://www.tuxera.com/community/ntfs-3g-advanced/ownership-and-permissions/
>
> I exp
Something I wasn't aware of at the time of our prior discussion is
that the Linux NTFS-3g driver already supports Linux extended ACLs
on NTFS. This is discussed at
http://www.tuxera.com/community/ntfs-3g-advanced/ownership-and-permissions/
I explored taking a flash card back and forth between C
Hi Cygwin friends and users,
I released TEST version 2.4.0-0.18 of Cygwin. This is the last test
release if nothing unexpected happens. I plan to release officially
on Friday.
What's new:
---
- New, unified implementation of POSIX permission and ACL handling. The
new ACLs now stor
6 matches
Mail list logo
