Jason Tishler wrote:
I should have been more clear. I was reacting to the cyg not the lack
of a period. For example, in 8.0 we had libtcl80.a, in 8.3 now we have
libcygtk83.a. This name change is another reason why the above patch
needs to be reworked.
I'm not really willing to
- Original Message -
From: Jason Tishler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 9:25 AM
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: expect-20021218-1, gdb-20021218-1,
tcltk-20021218-1
Chris,
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 06:02:02PM -0500, Christopher Faylor
Chuck,
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 09:48:07AM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Jason Tishler wrote:
OK. I just wanted to check before I submitted my patch to the Python
patch collector.
Since the config scripts (/usr/lib/tclConfig.sh, /usr/lib/tkConfig.sh)
seem to be accurate now, is there any
Chris,
The final form of my (forthcoming) Cygwin Python _tkinter patch is
dependent on the disposition of the following two issues:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 06:33:18PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Anyway, it'd be nice(tm) if the tcltk binary package included the tk
header files under
Christopher Faylor wrote:
How have you managed to build cygwin in the past? The rationale for the
name difference has been made clear before. It is to make it clear that
these libraries are for modified cygwin versions of tcl/tk. I'm not
really willing to arbitrarily change the convention
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 06:59:38PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
How have you managed to build cygwin in the past? The rationale for
the name difference has been made clear before. It is to make it clear
that these libraries are for modified cygwin versions of tcl/tk.
Christopher Faylor wrote:
If you want to change this policy, lobby in the insight mailing list.
The insight developers were the people who made the decision to munge
the library names. However, the people who made the decision are
now long gone so maybe there will be no resistance to
Chuck,
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 06:44:43PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Python itself needs to be recompiled to use the new tcl/tk dlls,
because /usr/lib/python2.2/lib-dynload/_tkinter.dll depends on
cygtcl80.dll and cygtk80.dll, which are no longer present.
Jason, oh Jssoon
Sigh...
Jason Tishler writes:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 06:44:43PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Python itself needs to be recompiled to use the new tcl/tk dlls,
because /usr/lib/python2.2/lib-dynload/_tkinter.dll depends on
cygtcl80.dll and cygtk80.dll, which are no longer present.
Jason, oh
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I've made a new version of expect, GDB, and tcltk available for
downloading. These versions are a refresh from sources.redhat.com. The
intent of this release is to get all three packages into sync. gdb and
expect now rely on tcltk. gdb no longer contains the tcltk
On 09 May 2002, in a message titled Python and PIL and rebase, oh my!,
I said:
#2) --
Given that, I have a 3 requests for the tcl/tk maintainer:
1) for the next release, can we have the header files (other than
just tk.h) installed as well? (Where? I dunno...
Charles Wilson wrote:
Anyway, it'd be nice(tm) if the tcltk binary package included the tk
header files under /usr/include/tk/ and /usr/include/tk/X11/. See
http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/testing/tk-includes-8.3.tar.bz2
where the contents were taken from the tcltk -src
On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 05:51:57PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I've made a new version of expect, GDB, and tcltk available for
downloading. These versions are a refresh from sources.redhat.com. The
intent of this release is to get all three packages into sync. gdb
I've made a new version of expect, GDB, and tcltk available for
downloading. These versions are a refresh from sources.redhat.com. The
intent of this release is to get all three packages into sync. gdb and
expect now rely on tcltk. gdb no longer contains the tcltk dlls,
libraries or tcl
14 matches
Mail list logo
