Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-*-binutils-2.24.0.1.acd6540-1 (x86/x86_64)

2014-04-07 Thread Angelo Graziosi
Ciao m0viefreak, Il 07/04/2014 21:09, m0viefreak ha scritto: I fixed it for now by placing an empty dummy default-manifest.o file in working directory. May you describe how you have crated it or attach here your empty file? I tried in different ways but always fail in building with: "...defau

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-*-binutils-2.24.0.1.acd6540-1 (x86/x86_64)

2014-04-07 Thread m0viefreak
>> I fixed it for now by placing an empty dummy default-manifest.o file in >> working directory. > > May you describe how you have crated it or attach here your empty file? > I tried in different ways but always fail in building with: > > "...default-manifest.o: file not recognized: File format n

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-*-binutils-2.24.0.1.acd6540-1 (x86/x86_64)

2014-04-07 Thread Angelo Graziosi
m0viefreak wrote: I fixed it for now by placing an empty dummy default-manifest.o file in working directory. May you describe how you have crated it or attach here your empty file? I tried in different ways but always fail in building with: "...default-manifest.o: file not recognized: File f

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-*-binutils-2.24.0.1.acd6540-1 (x86/x86_64)

2014-04-06 Thread m0viefreak
> Please try again without the /bin/ prefix. > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16792 I see. Without the prefix it worked fine. >> Is there a way to disable that whole default-manifest.o thing for now >> without having to roll back to an older version of binutils? > > No, you may

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-*-binutils-2.24.0.1.acd6540-1 (x86/x86_64)

2014-04-06 Thread JonY
On 4/7/2014 06:11, m0viefreak wrote: > > Looks like it's not searching for the default-manifest.o in the correct > include paths. > > The mingw file resides in > /usr/{x86_64,i686}-w64-mingw32/lib/ > > Maybe it should be in > /usr/{x86_64,i686}-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/ > Yes, this is ap

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-*-binutils-2.24.0.1.acd6540-1 (x86/x86_64)

2014-04-06 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2014-04-06 17:11, m0viefreak wrote: The latest mingw64-binutils is broken for me: $ echo 'main() { }' > a.c; /bin/x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc a.c /usr/bin/x86_64-w64-mingw32-ld: cannot find default-manifest.o $ echo 'main() { }' > a.c; /bin/i686-w64-mingw32-gcc -m32 a.c /usr/bin/i686-w64-mingw32

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-*-binutils-2.24.0.1.acd6540-1 (x86/x86_64)

2014-04-06 Thread m0viefreak
The latest mingw64-binutils is broken for me: $ echo 'main() { }' > a.c; /bin/x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc a.c /usr/bin/x86_64-w64-mingw32-ld: cannot find default-manifest.o $ echo 'main() { }' > a.c; /bin/i686-w64-mingw32-gcc -m32 a.c /usr/bin/i686-w64-mingw32-ld: cannot find default-manifest.o It

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-*-binutils-2.24.0.1.acd6540-1 (x86/x86_64)

2014-04-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 2 19:05, JonY wrote: > On 4/2/2014 18:04, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> > >> I am told that this is happening due to a bug in an earlier binutils > >> release, though it still seems to be happening with -2. > >> > >> The error, for reference when linking ld.exe: > >> default-manifest.o: file

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-*-binutils-2.24.0.1.acd6540-1 (x86/x86_64)

2014-04-02 Thread JonY
On 4/2/2014 18:04, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >> I am told that this is happening due to a bug in an earlier binutils >> release, though it still seems to be happening with -2. >> >> The error, for reference when linking ld.exe: >> default-manifest.o: file not recognized: File format not recognized

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-*-binutils-2.24.0.1.acd6540-1 (x86/x86_64)

2014-04-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 2 06:57, JonY wrote: > On 4/2/2014 06:10, JonY wrote: > > On 4/2/2014 01:13, Denis Excoffier wrote: > >> On 2014-03-30 16:58, JonY wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Version 2.24.0.1.acd6540-1 of mingw64-*-binutils have been uploaded. > >>> > >>> This is a bug fix release from git. > >>> > >> This mus

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-*-binutils-2.24.0.1.acd6540-1 (x86/x86_64)

2014-04-01 Thread JonY
On 4/2/2014 06:10, JonY wrote: > On 4/2/2014 01:13, Denis Excoffier wrote: >> On 2014-03-30 16:58, JonY wrote: >> >>> >>> Version 2.24.0.1.acd6540-1 of mingw64-*-binutils have been uploaded. >>> >>> This is a bug fix release from git. >>> >> This must be more than a simple bug fix release. >> >> I’

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-*-binutils-2.24.0.1.acd6540-1 (x86/x86_64)

2014-04-01 Thread JonY
On 4/2/2014 01:13, Denis Excoffier wrote: > On 2014-03-30 16:58, JonY wrote: > >> >> Version 2.24.0.1.acd6540-1 of mingw64-*-binutils have been uploaded. >> >> This is a bug fix release from git. >> > This must be more than a simple bug fix release. > > I’m talking about the > mingw64-x86_64-binu

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-*-binutils-2.24.0.1.acd6540-1 (x86/x86_64)

2014-04-01 Thread Denis Excoffier
On 2014-03-30 16:58, JonY wrote: > > Version 2.24.0.1.acd6540-1 of mingw64-*-binutils have been uploaded. > > This is a bug fix release from git. > This must be more than a simple bug fix release. I’m talking about the mingw64-x86_64-binutils-2.24.0.1.acd6540-1.tar.xz, which does not contain u

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mingw64-*-binutils-2.24.0.1.acd6540-1 (x86/x86_64)

2014-03-30 Thread JonY
Version 2.24.0.1.acd6540-1 of mingw64-*-binutils have been uploaded. This is a bug fix release from git. *** CYGWIN-ANNOUNCE UNSUBSCRIBE INFO *** If you want to unsubscribe from the cygwin-announce mailing list, look at the "List-Unsubscribe: " tag in the email header of this mess