Re: [Fwd: [gp@familiehaase.de: sem_* functions in cygwin]]

2004-12-20 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: [Catching up on some older mails] - Forwarded message from Gerrit P. Haase - From: Gerrit P. Haase To: cygwin ML Subject: sem_* functions in cygwin Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:48:20 +0100 Hi, nearly all sem_* functions are available, but

Re: [Fwd: [gp@familiehaase.de: sem_* functions in cygwin]]

2004-12-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 20 12:23, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Gerrit P. Haase wrote: I got an undefined reference to sem_unlock(). I don't remember now which package it was, however there is a maro used in linux which is based on ipc_unlock(): #define sem_unlock(id) ipc_unlock(sem_ids,id)

Re: [Fwd: [gp@familiehaase.de: sem_* functions in cygwin]]

2004-12-12 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Corinna Vinschen wrote: [Catching up on some older mails] - Forwarded message from Gerrit P. Haase - From: Gerrit P. Haase To: cygwin ML Subject: sem_* functions in cygwin Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:48:20 +0100 Hi, nearly all sem_* functions are available, but sem_unlock is missing, was

[Fwd: [gp@familiehaase.de: sem_* functions in cygwin]]

2004-12-09 Thread Corinna Vinschen
[Catching up on some older mails] - Forwarded message from Gerrit P. Haase - From: Gerrit P. Haase To: cygwin ML Subject: sem_* functions in cygwin Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:48:20 +0100 Hi, nearly all sem_* functions are available, but sem_unlock is missing, was there a

Re: [Fwd: [gp@familiehaase.de: sem_* functions in cygwin]]

2004-12-09 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 9 09:50, Mark Paulus wrote: So, does that mean that if process 1 opens a semaphore, process 2 also grabs it, then process 1 unlinks it, and then reconnects to it, that process 1 and process 2 do not have and cannot have the same semaphore anymore, even though they are using the same