[Meta-info (non-cyg specific)] (RE: /dev/stderr broken in /bin/sh?, makewhatis unhappy, apropos confused, or just me?)

2003-03-10 Thread linda w \(cyg\)
Replies inline below. Incidentally, why did your message arrive twice from two different From: addresses? And which should the replies go to? --- One address is subscribed to the list, the other is not. Normally, if one responds to 'all', it goes to the OP and the list. If one just

Re: [Meta-info (non-cyg specific)] (RE: /dev/stderr broken in /bin/sh?, makewhatis unhappy, apropos confused, or just me?)

2003-03-10 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, linda w (cyg) wrote: Replies inline below. Incidentally, why did your message arrive twice from two different From: addresses? And which should the replies go to? --- One address is subscribed to the list, the other is not. Normally, if one responds to

Re: [Meta-info (non-cyg specific)] (RE: /dev/stderr broken in /bin/sh?, makewhatis unhappy, apropos confused, or just me?)

2003-03-10 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 02:59:29PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: FYI, both went to the list, hence the question. See http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-03/msg00655.html and http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-03/msg00646.html. Igor P.S. There is no need to Cc: cygwin-apps@, the original

[Meta-info (non-cyg specific)] (RE: /dev/stderr broken in /bin/sh?, makewhatis unhappy, apropos confused, or just me?)

2003-03-10 Thread linda w \(cyg\)
Replies inline below. Incidentally, why did your message arrive twice from two different From: addresses? And which should the replies go to? --- One address is subscribed to the list, the other is not. Normally, if one responds to 'all', it goes to the OP and the list. If one just