Hi!
Wednesday, 15 May, 2002 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>I don't know how (when/if) cygwin will implement dwarf2 EH. Richard
>>Henderson's patch was spot on, except for wrong use of -1 rather than 0
>>as sentinel for end of eh_frame table.
>>
>>My preference is to try to keep t
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 02:28:55PM +1000, Danny Smith wrote:
> --- Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2002 at
>11:15:48AM +1000, Danny Smith wrote:
>> >>Perhaps it's time to drop the -mno-cygwin support and just supply a
>> >>cygwin hosted mingw32 targeted cross compil
--- "Billinghurst, David (CRTS)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
Danny,
>
> Can you elaborate on this. Now would be a good time to get
> dwarf2 EH working on cygwin. It would be painful to release
> a cygwin gcc-3.1 with sjlj exceptions, then switch.
>
My feelings exactly.
Give me 12-18 hours
rnals.
-Original Message-
From: Danny Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 15 May 2002 2:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [MinGW-dvlpr] Re: gcc 3.1 [-mno-cygwin and __main ]
I don't know how (when/if) cygwin will implement dwarf2 EH. Richard
Henders
--- Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2002 at
11:15:48AM +1000, Danny Smith wrote:
> >>Perhaps it's time to drop the -mno-cygwin support and just supply a
> >>cygwin hosted mingw32 targeted cross compiler?
> >
> >That is a key question.
>
> I assume that you're talk
--- Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 15, 2002 at
11:15:48AM +1000, Danny Smith wrote:
> >>Perhaps it's time to drop the -mno-cygwin support and just supply a
> >>cygwin hosted mingw32 targeted cross compiler?
> >
> >That is a key question.
>
> I assume that you're talk
6 matches
Mail list logo
