Here https://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-05/msg00139.html is another
posix permission related problem. Without answer from authors.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 09:20:10PM -0500, Steven Penny wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Steven Penny wrote:
Here is the test I ran:
The test I ran here
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-04/msg00186.html
is now failing again:
$ cd /cygdrive/c
$ touch ~/{alpha,bravo}.sh
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Steven Penny wrote:
Here is the test I ran:
The test I ran here
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-04/msg00186.html
is now failing again:
$ cd /cygdrive/c
$ touch ~/{alpha,bravo}.sh ~+/{charlie,delta}.sh
$ chmod +x ~/bravo.sh ~+/delta.sh
$ ls -l
Hi Ismail,
On Apr 16 09:48, Ismail Donmez wrote:
Corinna Vinschen-2 wrote
On Apr 16 09:09, Ismail Donmez wrote:
[~/src/mutt] chmod +x config.status
chmod: changing permissions of ‘config.status’: Permission denied
This is really surprising.
[~/src/mutt] icacls config.status
On Apr 17 09:30, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi Ismail,
On Apr 16 09:48, Ismail Donmez wrote:
Corinna Vinschen-2 wrote
On Apr 16 09:09, Ismail Donmez wrote:
[~/src/mutt] chmod +x config.status
chmod: changing permissions of ‘config.status’: Permission denied
This is really
Hi,
Corinna Vinschen-2 wrote
On Apr 17 09:30, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I think I found the culprit. I'll uploade a -0.7 test release in
the next hour or so.
So far all my tests work, thanks a bunch!
--
View this message in context:
http://cygwin.1069669.n5.nabble.com/TESTERS-needed-New
On Apr 17 08:17, Ismail Donmez wrote:
Hi,
Corinna Vinschen-2 wrote
On Apr 17 09:30, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I think I found the culprit. I'll uploade a -0.7 test release in
the next hour or so.
So far all my tests work, thanks a bunch!
Thanks for your feedback!
Corinna
--
myself gives no error whatsoever. I'll try to come up with a better report.
Thanks a lot!
--
View this message in context:
http://cygwin.1069669.n5.nabble.com/TESTERS-needed-New-POSIX-permission-handling-tp117406p117615.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On Apr 16 03:20, Ismail Donmez wrote:
Corinna Vinschen-2 wrote
I just applied a patch which is supposed to handle this owner==group
scenario better.
In short, Cygwin will try to handle POSIX user and group permissions
separately, even if owner == group. This is basically a fake as far
On Apr 16 09:09, Ismail Donmez wrote:
Hi,
[...]
So I am trying to configure and install mutt, and the first error I see is
at the end of configure:
configure: creating ./config.status
chmod: changing permissions of './config.status': Permission denied
configure: error: write failure
# owner: ismail
# group: ismail
user::rwx
group::r-x
group:SYSTEM:rwx
group:Administrators:rwx
mask:r-x
other:r-x
Any ideas? :)
Thank you.
--
View this message in context:
http://cygwin.1069669.n5.nabble.com/TESTERS-needed-New-POSIX-permission-handling-tp117406p117621.html
Sent from the Cygwin
)
CREATOR GROUP:(OI)(CI)(IO)(RX)
NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM:(OI)(CI)(IO)(RX,W,DC)
BUILTIN\Administrators:(OI)(CI)(IO)(RX,W,DC)
Everyone:(OI)(CI)(IO)(RX)
Successfully processed 1 files; Failed processing 0 files
--
View this message in context:
http://cygwin.1069669.n5.nabble.com/TESTERS-needed-New
Hi Ismail,
On Apr 12 16:25, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 12 06:21, İsmail Dönmez wrote:
Corinna Vinschen-2 wrote
On Apr 11 10:11, donmez wrote:
Corinna Vinschen-2 wrote
I just applied a patch I'm working on for quite some time now. As I
outlined before on this list, the POSIX
On Apr 11 10:11, donmez wrote:
Hi,
Corinna Vinschen-2 wrote
Hi folks,
I just applied a patch I'm working on for quite some time now. As I
outlined before on this list, the POSIX permission handling has aged
considerably and, for historical reasons, did things differently
On Apr 11 09:26, Ernie Rael wrote:
I'm primarily a lurker, reading this list hoping things soak in a bit. So I
may be off base on this.
In the table below, describing NULL DENY access mask, looks like there's a
typo concerning read/execute. (of course it might just be a windows mapping
this to be a generic bug, skimmed over one
important details. This is on Win 10 beta build 10049 x64/brown paper bag.
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://cygwin.1069669.n5.nabble.com/TESTERS-needed-New-POSIX-permission-handling-tp117406p117479.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing
On Apr 12 06:21, İsmail Dönmez wrote:
Hi,
Corinna Vinschen-2 wrote
On Apr 11 10:11, donmez wrote:
Hi,
Corinna Vinschen-2 wrote
Hi folks,
I just applied a patch I'm working on for quite some time now. As I
outlined before on this list, the POSIX permission
On 11/04/2015 16:58, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, Steven Penny!
What is '~+'? Is that some weird bash feature?
If the tilde-prefix is ‘~+’, the value of the shell variable PWD
replaces the tilde-prefix.
http://gnu.org/software/bash/manual/html_node/Tilde-Expansion
In other words,
On Apr 11 10:47, Achim Gratz wrote:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
- To accommodate Windows default ACLs, the new code ignores SYSTEM and
Administrators group permissions when computing the MASK/CLASS_OBJ
permission mask on old ACLs, and it doesn't deny access to SYSTEM and
Administrators
On Apr 10 19:00, Steven Penny wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Please give the new code a try. I uploaded new 2015-04-10 developer
snapshots to https://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Here is the test I ran:
$ cd /cygdrive/c
$ touch ~/{alpha,bravo}.sh
Corinna Vinschen writes:
- To accommodate Windows default ACLs, the new code ignores SYSTEM and
Administrators group permissions when computing the MASK/CLASS_OBJ
permission mask on old ACLs, and it doesn't deny access to SYSTEM and
Administrators group based on the value of
On 11. 4. 2015 11:08, Achim Gratz wrote:
David Macek writes:
Power Users don't have access to (almost) everything, like
Administrators do. The Domain Administrators group is a member of
Administrators, so unless I'm missing something, there's no reason to
have them explicitely in the DACL.
David Macek writes:
Power Users don't have access to (almost) everything, like
Administrators do. The Domain Administrators group is a member of
Administrators, so unless I'm missing something, there's no reason to
have them explicitely in the DACL.
That doesn't stop folks from using them in
On 11. 4. 2015 10:47, Achim Gratz wrote:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
- To accommodate Windows default ACLs, the new code ignores SYSTEM and
Administrators group permissions when computing the MASK/CLASS_OBJ
permission mask on old ACLs, and it doesn't deny access to SYSTEM and
On Apr 10 15:13, Warren Young wrote:
On Apr 10, 2015, at 4:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com
wrote:
This should help in Cygwin-Windows interoperability.
That’s pretty vague.
Would you care to list some specific expected improvements from this
change? Are there
On Apr 11 11:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 10 19:00, Steven Penny wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Please give the new code a try. I uploaded new 2015-04-10 developer
snapshots to https://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Here is the test I ran:
$ cd
That means, even if SYSTEM or Administrators have full access to the
file, the POSIX permssion bits will not reflect that fact. And while
other users get access denied based on the mask value, SYSTEM and
Administrators will never get access denied based on the mask.
If you want
On 11. 4. 2015 11:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Out of curiosity, does the code somehow distinguish ACLs that don't
have these default permissions (or have different permissions set for
SYSTEM / Administrators)?
I don't quite understand the question.
For a start, I'd like to point out how
On Apr 11 11:01, David Macek wrote:
On 11. 4. 2015 10:47, Achim Gratz wrote:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
- To accommodate Windows default ACLs, the new code ignores SYSTEM and
Administrators group permissions when computing the MASK/CLASS_OBJ
permission mask on old ACLs, and it doesn't
Greetings, Achim Gratz!
Corinna Vinschen writes:
- To accommodate Windows default ACLs, the new code ignores SYSTEM and
Administrators group permissions when computing the MASK/CLASS_OBJ
permission mask on old ACLs, and it doesn't deny access to SYSTEM and
Administrators group based on
I'm primarily a lurker, reading this list hoping things soak in a bit.
So I may be off base on this.
In the table below, describing NULL DENY access mask, looks like
there's a typo concerning read/execute. (of course it might just be a
windows mapping peculiarity that I really didn't want to
Greetings, Steven Penny!
What is '~+'? Is that some weird bash feature?
If the tilde-prefix is ‘~+’, the value of the shell variable PWD replaces the
tilde-prefix.
http://gnu.org/software/bash/manual/html_node/Tilde-Expansion
In other words, ~+/ is a weird way to say ./ ?
--
With best
is now on top
And running mutt results in:
Error creating temporary file /tmp/mutt-
Rolling back to an older snapshot fixes the problem.
--
View this message in context:
http://cygwin.1069669.n5.nabble.com/TESTERS-needed-New-POSIX-permission-handling-tp117406p117455.html
Sent from
David Macek writes:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc776499(v=ws.10).aspx
says otherwise about the group-in-group rights.
As I see it, nesting groups is just a more efficient way of populating
them, so by expanding the nested groups recursively you'll end up with
the effective set
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 4:40 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
What is '~+'? Is that some weird bash feature?
If the tilde-prefix is ‘~+’, the value of the shell variable PWD replaces the
tilde-prefix.
http://gnu.org/software/bash/manual/html_node/Tilde-Expansion
--
Problem reports:
On Apr 11 11:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 10 19:00, Steven Penny wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Please give the new code a try. I uploaded new 2015-04-10 developer
snapshots to https://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Here is the test I ran:
$ cd
On Apr 11 05:47, Steven Penny wrote:
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 4:40 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
What is '~+'? Is that some weird bash feature?
If the tilde-prefix is ‘~+’, the value of the shell variable PWD replaces the
tilde-prefix.
Ah, thanks. Learn something new each day (tcsh user
On Apr 11 14:35, David Macek wrote:
On 11. 4. 2015 11:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Out of curiosity, does the code somehow distinguish ACLs that don't
have these default permissions (or have different permissions set for
SYSTEM / Administrators)?
I don't quite understand the question.
On Apr 11 07:11, Bryan Berns wrote:
That means, even if SYSTEM or Administrators have full access to the
file, the POSIX permssion bits will not reflect that fact. And while
other users get access denied based on the mask value, SYSTEM and
Administrators will never get access
On Apr 10, 2015, at 4:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com wrote:
This should help in Cygwin-Windows interoperability.
That’s pretty vague.
Would you care to list some specific expected improvements from this change?
Are there known problem scenarios in the current world which
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Please give the new code a try. I uploaded new 2015-04-10 developer
snapshots to https://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Here is the test I ran:
$ cd /cygdrive/c
$ touch ~/{alpha,bravo}.sh ~+/{charlie,delta}.sh
$ chmod +x ~/bravo.sh
41 matches
Mail list logo
