coreutils-8.26-2
cygwin-2.10.0-1
Test case 1:
---
$ realpath //
//
---
Expected output: /
Test case 2:
---
$ MYDIR=//
$ test "$(realpath -e "$MYDIR" )" != / && echo rm -rf "$MYDIR"/*
rm -rf ///bin ///cygdrive ///Cygwin.bat ///Cygwin.ico ///Cygwin-
On 03/12/2018 03:28 PM, Mikhail Usenko via cygwin wrote:
coreutils-8.26-2
cygwin-2.10.0-1
Test case 1:
---
$ realpath //
//
Correct.
---
Expected output: /
Wrong.
On cygwin, '/' and '//' are two different directories, as allowed by
POSIX. Converting // int
Mikhail Usenko via cygwin writes:
> coreutils-8.26-2
> cygwin-2.10.0-1
>
> Test case 1:
> ---
> $ realpath //
> //
> ---
> Expected output: /
Adjust your expectations, a double slash at the beginning signifies a
network path (as expressedly allowed for in POSIX) and
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 21:47:09 +0100
Achim Gratz <...> wrote:
> This goes to show that you really, really, really want to understand the
> corner
> cases in this script.
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:41:00 -0500
Eric Blake <...> wrote:
> On cygwin, '/' and '//' are two different directories, as allowed by
On 03/12/2018 06:38 PM, Mikhail Usenko via cygwin wrote:
Well, guys my expextations are that the program/script execution conditions
in Cygwin should be the same as in other popular POSIX systems
(namely it is Linux)
POSIX says that the behavior of leading // is implementation-defined
(that is
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 20:43:13 -0500
Eric Blake <...> wrote:
> Furthermore, you need to realize that GNU coreutils 'rm' already has
> special logic (permitted by POSIX) such that 'rm -rf /' fails unless you
> use --no-preserve-root ('rm -rf /*' unfortunately does not trigger the
> special logic,
On 2018-03-14 04:58, Mikhail Usenko via cygwin wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 20:43:13 -0500
> Eric Blake <...> wrote:
> I don't know what this is for, but nevertheless,
> thank you for your efforts to eliminate of illiteracy among readers...
>> POSIX allows leeway between implementations; this is o
Am 14.03.2018 um 11:58 schrieb Mikhail Usenko via cygwin:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 20:43:13 -0500
Eric Blake <...> wrote:
...
Just because Linux has taken the stance that their documented definition
of // is "synonym for /" does NOT mean that ALL POSIX systems have taken
the same approach; Cygwin ha
On 2018-03-15 01:11, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> Am 14.03.2018 um 11:58 schrieb Mikhail Usenko via cygwin:
>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 20:43:13 -0500
>> Eric Blake <...> wrote:
>>> Just because Linux has taken the stance that their documented definition
>>> of // is "synonym for /" does NOT mean that ALL POSI
9 matches
Mail list logo
