Re: [gcc] FYI, libffi FAILs with cygwin snapshot 20100205, 20100207 & 20100210...

2010-02-16 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 15 20:38, Marco Atzeri wrote: > --- Lun 15/2/10, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto: > > Probably I found the culprit.  I introduced a bug in vfprintf when I > > added thousands separator printing.  The result of the bug is that > > float or double values got an extra decimal point.  The float valu

Re: [gcc] FYI, libffi FAILs with cygwin snapshot 20100205, 20100207 & 20100210...

2010-02-15 Thread Marco Atzeri
--- Lun 15/2/10, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto: > On Feb 15 15:15, Corinna Vinschen > wrote: > > On Feb 15 10:18, Marco Atzeri wrote: > > > I hope it can help > > > > Thanks, but that's not exactly "simple".  It > requires to run a test > > through an interpreter.  It would still be more > helpful

Re: [gcc] FYI, libffi FAILs with cygwin snapshot 20100205, 20100207 & 20100210...

2010-02-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 07:15:14PM +0100, Christian Joensson wrote: >2010/2/15 Christopher Faylor: >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:31:22AM +0100, Christian Joensson wrote: >>>2010/2/14 Christian Joensson: >>> > 20100204 works... 20100205 doesn't... FWIW, 20100212 does seem to suffer fro

Re: [gcc] FYI, libffi FAILs with cygwin snapshot 20100205, 20100207 & 20100210...

2010-02-15 Thread Christian Joensson
2010/2/15 Christopher Faylor: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:31:22AM +0100, Christian Joensson wrote: >>2010/2/14 Christian Joensson: >> 20100204 works... 20100205 doesn't... >>> >>> FWIW, 20100212 does seem to suffer from similar problems as does >>> 201002{05,07,10} does, ie, gcc trunk (revisi

Re: [gcc] FYI, libffi FAILs with cygwin snapshot 20100205, 20100207 & 20100210...

2010-02-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 15 15:15, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Feb 15 10:18, Marco Atzeri wrote: > > I hope it can help > > Thanks, but that's not exactly "simple". It requires to run a test > through an interpreter. It would still be more helpful to get a simple > testcase in plain C or at least just the regula

Re: [gcc] FYI, libffi FAILs with cygwin snapshot 20100205, 20100207 & 20100210...

2010-02-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 15 10:31, Christian Joensson wrote: > 2010/2/14 Christian Joensson: > > >> 20100204 works... 20100205 doesn't... > > > > FWIW, 20100212 does seem to suffer from similar problems as does > > 201002{05,07,10} does, ie, gcc trunk (revision 156700) libffi > > testsuite have the same issue with

Re: [gcc] FYI, libffi FAILs with cygwin snapshot 20100205, 20100207 & 20100210...

2010-02-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 15 10:18, Marco Atzeri wrote: > --- Lun 15/2/10, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto: > > > Data: Lunedì 15 febbraio 2010, 09:57 > > On Feb 14 15:30, Christian Joensson > > wrote: > > > 2010/2/11 Christian Joensson: > > > > well, maybe this never shows up on cygwin > > developers' list.. but > > >

Re: [gcc] FYI, libffi FAILs with cygwin snapshot 20100205, 20100207 & 20100210...

2010-02-15 Thread Marco Atzeri
--- Lun 15/2/10, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto: > Data: Lunedì 15 febbraio 2010, 09:57 > On Feb 14 15:30, Christian Joensson > wrote: > > 2010/2/11 Christian Joensson: > > > well, maybe this never shows up on cygwin > developers' list.. but > > > > > > 20100204 works... 20100205 doesn't... > > > >

Re: [gcc] FYI, libffi FAILs with cygwin snapshot 20100205, 20100207 & 20100210...

2010-02-15 Thread Christian Joensson
2010/2/14 Christian Joensson: >> 20100204 works... 20100205 doesn't... > > FWIW, 20100212 does seem to suffer from similar problems as does > 201002{05,07,10} does, ie, gcc trunk (revision 156700) libffi > testsuite have the same issue with crept in "." neither 20100214 works for libffi testsuite

Re: [gcc] FYI, libffi FAILs with cygwin snapshot 20100205, 20100207 & 20100210...

2010-02-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 14 15:30, Christian Joensson wrote: > 2010/2/11 Christian Joensson: > > well, maybe this never shows up on cygwin developers' list.. but > > > > 20100204 works... 20100205 doesn't... > > FWIW, 20100212 does seem to suffer from similar problems as does > 201002{05,07,10} does, ie, gcc trunk

Re: [gcc] FYI, libffi FAILs with cygwin snapshot 20100205, 20100207 & 20100210...

2010-02-14 Thread Christian Joensson
2010/2/11 Christian Joensson: >>> Just FYI... the latest posted test results, at >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-02/msg00907.html, shows a >>> substatntial amount of FAILs for libffi, this is with cygwin1.dll >>> snapshot 20100207 (I also checked briefly using 20100210, also gives a

Re: [gcc] FYI, libffi FAILs with cygwin snapshot 20100205, 20100207 & 20100210...

2010-02-12 Thread Marco Atzeri
--- Gio 11/2/10, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto: > On Feb 11 17:04, Corinna Vinschen > wrote: > > On Feb 11 15:39, Marco Atzeri wrote: > > > --- Gio 11/2/10, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto: > > > > On Feb 11 07:40, Christian Joensson > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Test Run By chj on Wed Feb 10 > 11:39:41

Re: [gcc] FYI, libffi FAILs with cygwin snapshot 20100205, 20100207 & 20100210...

2010-02-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 11 17:04, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Feb 11 15:39, Marco Atzeri wrote: > > --- Gio 11/2/10, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto: > > > On Feb 11 07:40, Christian Joensson > > > wrote: > > > > >> Test Run By chj on Wed Feb 10 11:39:41 2010 > > > > > 115,118c115,118 > > > > > < 7 8. 9 1 9. 3: 8 17.

Re: [gcc] FYI, libffi FAILs with cygwin snapshot 20100205, 20100207 & 20100210...

2010-02-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 11 15:39, Marco Atzeri wrote: > --- Gio 11/2/10, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto: > > On Feb 11 07:40, Christian Joensson > > wrote: > > > >> Test Run By chj on Wed Feb 10 11:39:41 2010 > > > > 115,118c115,118 > > > > < 7 8. 9 1 9. 3: 8 17. 12 > > > > < res: 8 17. 12 > > > > < 7 8. 9 1 9. 3: 8 1

Re: [gcc] FYI, libffi FAILs with cygwin snapshot 20100205, 20100207 & 20100210...

2010-02-11 Thread Marco Atzeri
--- Gio 11/2/10, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto: > On Feb 11 07:40, Christian Joensson > wrote: > > > A "diff ../../../objdir-156618/libffi.log > testsuite/libffi.log" (where > > > the first file is the log file when using the > cygwin1.dll snapshot > > > 20100207 and the second file is using the 1.7

Re: [gcc] FYI, libffi FAILs with cygwin snapshot 20100205, 20100207 & 20100210...

2010-02-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 11 07:40, Christian Joensson wrote: > > A "diff ../../../objdir-156618/libffi.log testsuite/libffi.log" (where > > the first file is the log file when using the cygwin1.dll snapshot > > 20100207 and the second file is using the 1.7.1-1 one) gives me this > > (as an example): > > > > 1c1 > >

Fwd: [gcc] FYI, libffi FAILs with cygwin snapshot 20100205, 20100207 & 20100210...

2010-02-10 Thread Christian Joensson
maybe this would have been appropriate, sorry for the other postings... -- Forwarded message -- From: Christian Joensson Date: 2010/2/10 Subject: Re: [gcc] FYI, libffi FAILs with cygwin snapshot 20100207 & 20100210... To: cygwin-develop...@cygwin.com Kopia: Dave Korn 2010/2/10