maybe this would have been appropriate, sorry for the other postings...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Christian Joensson
Date: 2010/2/10
Subject: Re: [gcc] FYI, libffi FAILs with cygwin snapshot 20100207 & 20100210...
To: cygwin-develop...@cygwin.com
Kopia: Dave Korn
2010/2/10
On Feb 11 07:40, Christian Joensson wrote:
> > A "diff ../../../objdir-156618/libffi.log testsuite/libffi.log" (where
> > the first file is the log file when using the cygwin1.dll snapshot
> > 20100207 and the second file is using the 1.7.1-1 one) gives me this
> > (as an example):
> >
> > 1c1
> >
--- Gio 11/2/10, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto:
> On Feb 11 07:40, Christian Joensson
> wrote:
> > > A "diff ../../../objdir-156618/libffi.log
> testsuite/libffi.log" (where
> > > the first file is the log file when using the
> cygwin1.dll snapshot
> > > 20100207 and the second file is using the 1.7
On Feb 11 15:39, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> --- Gio 11/2/10, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto:
> > On Feb 11 07:40, Christian Joensson
> > wrote:
> > > >> Test Run By chj on Wed Feb 10 11:39:41 2010
> > > > 115,118c115,118
> > > > < 7 8. 9 1 9. 3: 8 17. 12
> > > > < res: 8 17. 12
> > > > < 7 8. 9 1 9. 3: 8 1
On Feb 11 17:04, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 11 15:39, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > --- Gio 11/2/10, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto:
> > > On Feb 11 07:40, Christian Joensson
> > > wrote:
> > > > >> Test Run By chj on Wed Feb 10 11:39:41 2010
> > > > > 115,118c115,118
> > > > > < 7 8. 9 1 9. 3: 8 17.
--- Gio 11/2/10, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto:
> On Feb 11 17:04, Corinna Vinschen
> wrote:
> > On Feb 11 15:39, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > > --- Gio 11/2/10, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto:
> > > > On Feb 11 07:40, Christian Joensson
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> Test Run By chj on Wed Feb 10
> 11:39:41
2010/2/11 Christian Joensson:
>>> Just FYI... the latest posted test results, at
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-02/msg00907.html, shows a
>>> substatntial amount of FAILs for libffi, this is with cygwin1.dll
>>> snapshot 20100207 (I also checked briefly using 20100210, also gives a
On Feb 14 15:30, Christian Joensson wrote:
> 2010/2/11 Christian Joensson:
> > well, maybe this never shows up on cygwin developers' list.. but
> >
> > 20100204 works... 20100205 doesn't...
>
> FWIW, 20100212 does seem to suffer from similar problems as does
> 201002{05,07,10} does, ie, gcc trunk
2010/2/14 Christian Joensson:
>> 20100204 works... 20100205 doesn't...
>
> FWIW, 20100212 does seem to suffer from similar problems as does
> 201002{05,07,10} does, ie, gcc trunk (revision 156700) libffi
> testsuite have the same issue with crept in "."
neither 20100214 works for libffi testsuite
--- Lun 15/2/10, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto:
> Data: Lunedì 15 febbraio 2010, 09:57
> On Feb 14 15:30, Christian Joensson
> wrote:
> > 2010/2/11 Christian Joensson:
> > > well, maybe this never shows up on cygwin
> developers' list.. but
> > >
> > > 20100204 works... 20100205 doesn't...
> >
> >
On Feb 15 10:18, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> --- Lun 15/2/10, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto:
>
> > Data: Lunedì 15 febbraio 2010, 09:57
> > On Feb 14 15:30, Christian Joensson
> > wrote:
> > > 2010/2/11 Christian Joensson:
> > > > well, maybe this never shows up on cygwin
> > developers' list.. but
> > >
On Feb 15 10:31, Christian Joensson wrote:
> 2010/2/14 Christian Joensson:
>
> >> 20100204 works... 20100205 doesn't...
> >
> > FWIW, 20100212 does seem to suffer from similar problems as does
> > 201002{05,07,10} does, ie, gcc trunk (revision 156700) libffi
> > testsuite have the same issue with
On Feb 15 15:15, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 15 10:18, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > I hope it can help
>
> Thanks, but that's not exactly "simple". It requires to run a test
> through an interpreter. It would still be more helpful to get a simple
> testcase in plain C or at least just the regula
2010/2/15 Christopher Faylor:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:31:22AM +0100, Christian Joensson wrote:
>>2010/2/14 Christian Joensson:
>>
20100204 works... 20100205 doesn't...
>>>
>>> FWIW, 20100212 does seem to suffer from similar problems as does
>>> 201002{05,07,10} does, ie, gcc trunk (revisi
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 07:15:14PM +0100, Christian Joensson wrote:
>2010/2/15 Christopher Faylor:
>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:31:22AM +0100, Christian Joensson wrote:
>>>2010/2/14 Christian Joensson:
>>>
> 20100204 works... 20100205 doesn't...
FWIW, 20100212 does seem to suffer fro
--- Lun 15/2/10, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto:
> On Feb 15 15:15, Corinna Vinschen
> wrote:
> > On Feb 15 10:18, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > > I hope it can help
> >
> > Thanks, but that's not exactly "simple". It
> requires to run a test
> > through an interpreter. It would still be more
> helpful
On Feb 15 20:38, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> --- Lun 15/2/10, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto:
> > Probably I found the culprit. I introduced a bug in vfprintf when I
> > added thousands separator printing. The result of the bug is that
> > float or double values got an extra decimal point. The float valu
17 matches
Mail list logo
