Re: 20040217 unhoses unzip!

2004-02-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 11:46:15PM -0500, Thomas L Roche wrote: On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: Hmm. I really don't understand why unless you were unzipping *a lot* of files with long filenames. There should have been something like 32MB of space to waste before you saw the

20040217 unhoses unzip!

2004-02-17 Thread Thomas L Roche
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 03:18:33PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: I've created a new snapshot http://cygwin.com/snapshots/cygwin1-20040217.dll.bz2 which incorporates Pierre's much appreciated research into the unzip[-related] problem. and which WORKS! n == 1 (I'll check how it works for

Re: 20040217 unhoses unzip!

2004-02-17 Thread Pierre A. Humblet
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 09:49:32PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:06:19PM -0500, Thomas L Roche wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 03:18:33PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: I've created a new snapshot http://cygwin.com/snapshots/cygwin1-20040217.dll.bz2 which

Re: 20040217 unhoses unzip!

2004-02-17 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 07:06:19PM -0500, Thomas L Roche wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 03:18:33PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: I've created a new snapshot http://cygwin.com/snapshots/cygwin1-20040217.dll.bz2 which incorporates

Re: 20040217 unhoses unzip!

2004-02-17 Thread Thomas L Roche
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: Hmm. I really don't understand why unless you were unzipping *a lot* of files with long filenames. There should have been something like 32MB of space to waste before you saw the problem. Igor Pechtchanski Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:09:51 -0500 (EST)