After installing a new machine with cygwin, it displayed the message:
Your groupname is currently "mkgroup_l_d". This indicates
that not all users and groups are listed in /etc/passwd and
/etc/group files.
See the man pages for mkpasswd and mkgroup then, for example, run
mkpas
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Robert Thorpe
> Sent: 05 October 2004 11:24
> After installing a new machine with cygwin, it displayed the message:
>
> Your groupname is currently "mkgroup_l_d". This indicates
> that not all users and groups are listed in /
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 03:24:26AM -0700, Robert Thorpe wrote:
> After installing a new machine with cygwin, it displayed the message:
>
> Your groupname is currently "mkgroup_l_d". This indicates
> that not all users and groups are listed in /etc/passwd and
> /etc/group files.
>
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 03:24:26AM -0700, Robert Thorpe wrote:
> > After installing a new machine with cygwin, it displayed the message:
> >
> > Your groupname is currently "mkgroup_l_d". This indicates
> > that not all users and groups are listed in /etc/passwd and
> > /etc/group f
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Robert Thorpe
> Sent: 05 October 2004 19:41
> > > Unfortunately, though, "man mkgroup" or "man mkpasswd" do
> not work, they're are no man pages for these utilities.
> >
> > Install the cygwin-doc package.
>
> Thanks, that was quit
Dave Korn schrieb:
I'd go so far as to say that the docs should not only be a default package, it
should be a compulsory package that can't be uninstalled, only updated. Or
perhaps it should just rolled into the cygwin base package. Whatever, there's no
good reason to allow people to install an
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 09:15:55PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
>BTW: What about a man page for dllwrap?
>
>I don't think that binutils wants to support it in their texinfo doc.
Why would you assume that? I'm the x86 binutils maintainer. If you
submit a patch to the proper list, it will certainly b
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 09:15:55PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote:
BTW: What about a man page for dllwrap?
I don't think that binutils wants to support it in their texinfo doc.
Why would you assume that? I'm the x86 binutils maintainer. If you
submit a patch to the proper li
8 matches
Mail list logo
