Re: Add ability to hide non-standard itoa/utoa() in stdlib.h ?

Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote: On Jan 22 16:47, Christian Franke via Cygwin wrote: Busybox does not build OOTB on Cygwin due to the addition of itoa/utoa() to newlib in 2014: https://cygwin.com/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=commit;h=32c96dd This is because Busybox use local functions with same

Re: Add ability to hide non-standard itoa/utoa() in stdlib.h ?

On Jan 22 16:47, Christian Franke via Cygwin wrote: > Busybox does not build OOTB on Cygwin due to the addition of itoa/utoa() to > newlib in 2014: > https://cygwin.com/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=commit;h=32c96dd > > This is because Busybox use local functions with same name but different > signat