On 17.04.2019 20:04, Achim Gratz wrote:
> The inofficial protocol for reaching out to a package maintainer is to
> put "[Attn. Maintainer] " in the subject of your mail. Said
> maintainer may be currently unavailable or busy with other stuff, so
> please give her/him ample time to respond, i.e.
LRN writes:
> Subj. I've been sending emails to this list for a couple of weeks now, and no
> one replies. Do these messages come through at all?
Yes, they do just fine.
> I know for a fact that the messages do end up in the ML archives, so
> they reach at least *some* places. In case this
On 17.04.2019 18:30, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2019-04-17 02:06, LRN wrote:
>> I've been sending emails to this list for a couple of weeks now, and no
>> one replies. Do these messages come through at all?
>
> The best way to initiate discussion may be replying to a previous post about a
> package
I too have had ongoing issues getting Cygwin mail. My spam package
regularly filters out emails for "protocol" violations which I then have
to notice and release. Some were for having multiple Reply-To headers.
I even got a notice from the list stating that email to me had been
bouncing.
On 2019-04-17 02:06, LRN wrote:
> I've been sending emails to this list for a couple of weeks now, and no
> one replies. Do these messages come through at all? I know for a fact that the
> messages do end up in the ML archives, so they reach at least *some* places.
> In case this message is being
Subj. I've been sending emails to this list for a couple of weeks now, and no
one replies. Do these messages come through at all? I know for a fact that the
messages do end up in the ML archives, so they reach at least *some* places.
In case this message is being read by anyone: i'm looking either
6 matches
Mail list logo
