Igor Peshansky wrote:
I'm sure Yaakov meant that he'll patch it when he next gets around to it,
but in the meantime felt compelled to explain where the current directory
structure came from.
---
Why fix it if it isn't broken? It's that way on linux. All of the
mkfs extensions and fsck
On Sat, Apr 15, 2006 at 09:55:07PM -0700, Bryan D. Thomas wrote:
Also in the package is the /usr/sbin directory with nothing in it.
That's a flaw in the source's 'make install', which is not automake
based. The util-linux source provides several /usr/sbin commands as
well, but none of them are
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, Bryan D. Thomas wrote:
Also in the package is the /usr/sbin directory with nothing in it.
That's a flaw in the source's 'make install', which is not automake
based. The util-linux source provides several /usr/sbin commands as
well, but none of them are relevant to
Jerry D. Hedden wrote:
I noticed that the util-linux module places several apps in /sbin.
This is how the util-linux source package installs them, see also:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_contents.pl?searchmode=filelistword=util-linuxversion=testingarch=i386
Also in the package
Also in the package is the /usr/sbin directory with nothing in it.
That's a flaw in the source's 'make install', which is not automake based.
The util-linux source provides several /usr/sbin commands as well, but
none of them are relevant to Cygwin and are not built; the makefiles
create
I noticed that the util-linux module places several apps in /sbin.
Tue Mar 7 23:34:41 2006 12800 sbin/agetty.exe
Tue Mar 7 23:34:37 2006 9728 sbin/fsck.cramfs
Tue Mar 7 23:34:37 2006 20992 sbin/fsck.minix
Tue Mar 7 23:34:41 2006 26624
6 matches
Mail list logo
