friedman_hill ernest j wrote:
I think John Williams wrote:
It seems not many people build linux kernels under cygwin - I think
if they did, this issue I've found would have been reported earlier,
because it's the first step in the kernel configuration process.
OK, I've gotta ask -- WHY do you wa
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 07:10:00PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> >That tyrant CGF, who won't let me leave, uses Linux to build Cygwin. Is
> >that irony or hypocrisy? (Right, right. It's "pragmatism.")
>
> I'm still detecting a certain wistful qual
Hi Sam,
I've ported uClinux to a new reconfigurable softcore microprocessor.
The gcc toolchain for this little beastie runs under Cygwin (well,
actually something called Xygwin, but that's another story entirely)..
For the record, I've built a couple of bootable kernels
under Cygwin. Yes, I
Randall R Schulz wrote:
John,
Are you a famous composer? If so, are you _the_ famous composer?
No, and nor am I the famous and very talented classical guitarist.
I have two guitars, but I can't play either of them :O
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug report
> I think John Williams wrote:
> >
> > It seems not many people build linux kernels under cygwin - I think
> > if they did, this issue I've found would have been reported earlier,
> > because it's the first step in the kernel configuration process.
>
> OK, I've gotta ask -- WHY do you want to do
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 07:10:00PM -0800, Randall R Schulz wrote:
>That tyrant CGF, who won't let me leave, uses Linux to build Cygwin. Is
>that irony or hypocrisy? (Right, right. It's "pragmatism.")
I'm still detecting a certain wistful quality in your email when you
mention linux, Randall. Tha
Would someone who has that talent be dealing with short tempered chits?
I dont think so..
-M
- Original Message -
From: "Randall R Schulz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 8:10 PM
Subject: Re: Bug in Cygwin bash?
> Jo
I think John Williams wrote:
>
> It seems not many people build linux kernels under cygwin - I think
> if they did, this issue I've found would have been reported earlier,
> because it's the first step in the kernel configuration process.
OK, I've gotta ask -- WHY do you want to do this in the fi
John,
Are you a famous composer? If so, are you _the_ famous composer?
At 18:58 2003-04-02, John Williams wrote:
Randall R Schulz wrote:
John,
Yes, there's a limitation on the total volume of argument strings.
All Unix systems have such a limit and so does Cygwin. The limits
vary from system to
Randall R Schulz wrote:
John,
Yes, there's a limitation on the total volume of argument strings. All
Unix systems have such a limit and so does Cygwin. The limits vary from
system to system, though POSIX dictates a minimum value for this limit.
Anybody know the standard Cygwin limit off the top
John,
Yes, there's a limitation on the total volume of argument strings. All
Unix systems have such a limit and so does Cygwin. The limits vary from
system to system, though POSIX dictates a minimum value for this limit.
If you've got to deal in some kind of open-ended argument list (lists
of
Hi folks,
I've found a bizarro error that may in fact relate to Cygwin/bash. I'm
using the latest version (ran setup and refreshed just yesterday).
In the linux kernel configuration process, there is a rule in
/linux-2.4.x/makefile that looks like this:
dep-files:
scripts/mkdep -- `fi
12 matches
Mail list logo
