Re: Bug in Cygwin strtod()

2012-12-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 19 08:03, marco atzeri wrote: > On 12/19/2012 2:30 AM, KHMan wrote: > >On 12/19/2012 8:54 AM, Cary R. wrote: > >>The following code demonstrates a subtle bug in the Cygwin version of > >>strtod(). The value it generates is slightly different than the value > >>when using the math header file

Re: Bug in Cygwin strtod()

2012-12-18 Thread marco atzeri
On 12/19/2012 2:30 AM, KHMan wrote: On 12/19/2012 8:54 AM, Cary R. wrote: The following code demonstrates a subtle bug in the Cygwin version of strtod(). The value it generates is slightly different than the value when using the math header files. This used to work correctly some time ago (month

Re: Bug in Cygwin strtod()

2012-12-18 Thread KHMan
On 12/19/2012 8:54 AM, Cary R. wrote: The following code demonstrates a subtle bug in the Cygwin version of strtod(). The value it generates is slightly different than the value when using the math header files. This used to work correctly some time ago (months). I just took the time to track

Bug in Cygwin strtod()

2012-12-18 Thread Cary R.
The following code demonstrates a subtle bug in the Cygwin version of strtod(). The value it generates is slightly different than the value when using the math header files. This used to work correctly some time ago (months). I just took the time to track the problem down in our regression suite