On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:22:46 -0700, Brian Dessent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> NightStrike wrote:
>
>> If cygwin ever wants to be able to support newer gcc compilers,
>> something needs to be done in this area. There are several options,
>
> That's a quite a misleading statement to make. Everythi
NightStrike wrote:
> If cygwin ever wants to be able to support newer gcc compilers,
> something needs to be done in this area. There are several options,
That's a quite a misleading statement to make. Everything is fine for a
native 4.4 using 3.4 as the bootstrap compiler. That's the whole po
I figured I would take the liberty of informing anyone from the cygwin
community that might not be on the gcc mailing lists. After a recent
merge of the "tuples" branch of gcc to the mainline gcc, gcc stopped
being compilable by the 3.4.4 compiler that comes with cygwin. There
are two bugs for th
3 matches
Mail list logo