Michael D. Crawford wrote:
Unfortunately, gcc-java is 3.4.1, but under "New" it says 3.3.3-3. If I
let the installer proceed, it will remove gcj 3.4.1 (cygming special)
and replace it with gcj 3.3.3 (cygwin special). I've experienced this
several times. So I click in the New column for gcj-ja
At 11:21 AM 9/13/2004, you wrote:
>Just now I see that Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>
>>Don't mess with the version numbers it shows you. Use the ones it shows
>>when the Curr(ent) radio button is selected or the ones it shows when
>>the Exp(erimental) radio button is selected.
>
>That looks li
(A stream of consciousness transcript in which Mike gets a clue about
using Setup...)
Larry Hall wrote:
You might be getting caught by some arcane setup logic with dependencies.
I'd recommend uninstalling all gcc packages and then reinstall all the ones
you need together. That should get you the
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 11:20:02PM -0300, "Michael D. Crawford" wrote:
> What that seems to indicate is that I don't have all the parts of gcc
> installed, at least not all the right versions. Unfortunately, setup
> seems to also know about versions 3.3.3-3, 20040810-1 and 20040822-1 of
> vario
At 10:20 PM 9/12/2004, you wrote:
>I'm having trouble using setup to install gcj (gcc-java) on my Windows 2000 SP4 box.
>There are several versions of it available in setup, and I don't seem to be able to
>get all the parts of the version I want installed. It's confusing to me, and I think
>it
I'm having trouble using setup to install gcj (gcc-java) on my Windows
2000 SP4 box. There are several versions of it available in setup, and
I don't seem to be able to get all the parts of the version I want
installed. It's confusing to me, and I think it's confusing setup too,
with the resu
6 matches
Mail list logo
