> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cygwin on Win 2000
>
> FYI everyone...
>
> Command.com really *should* be there. You really *shouldn't* ever use
it
> directly, though.
>
> If you launch a console app which turns out to be 16-bit, NT/2000/XP
> automaticall
FYI everyone...
Command.com really *should* be there. You really *shouldn't* ever use it directly,
though.
If you launch a console app which turns out to be 16-bit, NT/2000/XP automatically
instantiates command.com (and then passes all of its operations back to CMD.EXE).
I suspect the OPs
> Mine was a clean install in each case with only the service packs and
> some patches being added.
I installed it from scratch every time but the first (of course...) but
\winnt\system32\command.com is definitely there, in Win98 is
widows\command\command.com.. be it an upgrade of a from scratch.
t; -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > On Behalf Of Andrew Markebo
> > Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 2002 3:37 PM
> > To: Stephano Mariani
> > Cc: 'Jason Tishler'; 'Anthony P Praino'; [EMAIL PRO
t; To: Stephano Mariani
> > Cc: 'Jason Tishler'; 'Anthony P Praino'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Cygwin on Win 2000
> >
> > / "Stephano Mariani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > | Strange... I do not seem to have that file (I chec
Stephano,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 03:47:28PM -, Stephano Mariani wrote:
> I am quite interested to figure out why... did you install your win2k
> over an existing windows version or was it a clean install?
>
> Mine was a clean install in each case with only the service packs and
> some patch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On Behalf Of Andrew Markebo
> Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 2002 3:37 PM
> To: Stephano Mariani
> Cc: 'Jason Tishler'; 'Anthony P Praino'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cygwin on Win 2000
>
> / "Stephano Mar
/ "Stephano Mariani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Strange... I do not seem to have that file (I checked three machines,
| win2k Pro SP2, Win2k Pro SP1, WinXP Pro).
Can be found on my Win2k Pro SP2, ahh well maybe something depending
on your shoesize or something, definetly nothing for cygwin ;-)
x27;Anthony P Praino'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Cygwin on Win 2000
>
> Stephano,
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:12:48PM -, Stephano Mariani wrote:
> > Windows 2000 has no command.com.
>
> Sure it does:
>
> $ ls -l c:/WINNT/system32/command.c
Stephano,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:12:48PM -, Stephano Mariani wrote:
> Windows 2000 has no command.com.
Sure it does:
$ ls -l c:/WINNT/system32/command.com
-rwxrwxr-x1 Administ SYSTEM 50620 Jul 26 2000
c:/WINNT/system32/command.com
Whether or not someone would want t
a hobbit a ring and he eats fish for an age.
- Original Message -
From: "Anthony P Praino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:58
Subject: Cygwin on Win 2000
> I installed Cygwin on mid Feb. on my Win 2000 Intellistation.
&g
2002 8:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Cygwin on Win 2000
>
> I installed Cygwin on mid Feb. on my Win 2000 Intellistation.
> While the cygwin 'window' interface allows the use of the standard
unix
> tools and utilities, the Dos (command.com) window does not.
&g
I installed Cygwin on mid Feb. on my Win 2000 Intellistation.
While the cygwin 'window' interface allows the use of the standard unix
tools and utilities, the Dos (command.com) window does not.
I did a full install and so am wondering if I missed something in the setup
or configuration. As I unde
13 matches
Mail list logo
