Re: Can't install from ports server (Was: Re: Debug info broken for gcc-4.5.0 (experimental))

2011-07-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 01:46:14PM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote: >On 2011-07-06 04:29, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >> GCC 4.5.3 and GDB 7.2 are available in Ports in the meantime. >> Yaakov > >I don't know who maintains the ports server, but when I try to use the >instructions on http://sourceware.org/

Can't install from ports server (Was: Re: Debug info broken for gcc-4.5.0 (experimental))

2011-07-06 Thread Rolf Campbell
On 2011-07-06 04:29, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: GCC 4.5.3 and GDB 7.2 are available in Ports in the meantime. Yaakov I don't know who maintains the ports server, but when I try to use the instructions on http://sourceware.org/cygwinports/ , and use http://downloads.sourceforge.net/cygwin-ports

Re: Debug info broken for gcc-4.5.0 (experimental)

2011-07-06 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 03:14 -0400, Ryan Johnson wrote: > I wondered if that was it, but there wasn't an updated gdb available > (experimental or otherwise). Silly thing is, I probably have a gdb-7.2 > sitting around somewhere that I didn't think to try. GCC 4.5.3 and GDB 7.2 are available in Por

Re: Debug info broken for gcc-4.5.0 (experimental)

2011-07-06 Thread Ryan Johnson
On 06/07/2011 3:09 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jul 6 02:06, Ryan Johnson wrote: Hi all, I've been using gcc-4.5.0 happily for a while, but today I had to break out gdb to chase down a seg fault. Unfortunately, gdb was getting line numbers completely wrong, so I had to revert to gcc-4.3 to w

Re: Debug info broken for gcc-4.5.0 (experimental)

2011-07-06 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 6 02:06, Ryan Johnson wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been using gcc-4.5.0 happily for a while, but today I had to > break out gdb to chase down a seg fault. Unfortunately, gdb was > getting line numbers completely wrong, so I had to revert to gcc-4.3 > to work through my bug. > > Has anybody e

Debug info broken for gcc-4.5.0 (experimental)

2011-07-05 Thread Ryan Johnson
Hi all, I've been using gcc-4.5.0 happily for a while, but today I had to break out gdb to chase down a seg fault. Unfortunately, gdb was getting line numbers completely wrong, so I had to revert to gcc-4.3 to work through my bug. Has anybody else seen this? If not, and if it's not trivial t