Re: named pipe (fifo) question

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 09:48:09AM -0400, bob 295 wrote: >(I'm on the list in digest mode so things can't thread easily) > >On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:01:55AM -0400, bob 295 wrote: >>>I'm porting a library from Linux to Cygwin and I've encountered a problem >with >>>the behavior of named pipes (f

Re: named pipe (fifo) question

(I'm on the list in digest mode so things can't thread easily) On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:01:55AM -0400, bob 295 wrote: >>I'm porting a library from Linux to Cygwin and I've encountered a problem with >>the behavior of named pipes (fifo's). >>... >>Is this the intended POSIX behavior? Is the p

Re: named pipe (fifo) question

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:01:55AM -0400, bob 295 wrote: >I'm porting a library from Linux to Cygwin and I've encountered a problem with >the behavior of named pipes (fifo's). >... >Is this the intended POSIX behavior? Is the problem the RDWR open? The problem is that Cygwin's implementation o

named pipe (fifo) question

I'm porting a library from Linux to Cygwin and I've encountered a problem with the behavior of named pipes (fifo's). In my sequence a pair of fifos are opened by each end of the conversation. One is opened as WRONLY, the other as RDWR. Some documentation seems to frown on RDWR pipes. We

Re: FIFO question

On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:47:57PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > While I was configuring and rebuilding screen, > I got the following message : > > configure: checking fifos... > - your fifos are not usable > > Is that so ? Yes. named pipes are not implemented yet. Corinna --

FIFO question

Hello, While I was configuring and rebuilding screen, I got the following message : configure: checking fifos... - your fifos are not usable Is that so ? Regards, Jurgen -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html D