Re: FLTK versions in Cygwin [was: Re: units: update, FHS compliance]

2010-01-26 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:28:56PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: Meh. Unlike linux, there is a significant portion of the cygwin user base that treats cygwin simply as a build environment -- but use a compiler for native win32 $hosts. I don't much like it, but that's reality. (...why did Cygnus

FW: FLTK versions in Cygwin [was: Re: units: update, FHS compliance]

2010-01-26 Thread Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]
Christopher Faylor sent the following at Tuesday, January 26, 2010 9:38 AM On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:28:56PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: I don't much like it, but that's reality. (...why did Cygnus fund the early development, in the first place? To have a windows-hosted build environment for

Re: FW: FLTK versions in Cygwin [was: Re: units: update, FHS compliance]

2010-01-26 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 10:14:44AM -0500, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote: Christopher Faylor sent the following at Tuesday, January 26, 2010 9:38 AM On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:28:56PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: I don't much like it, but that's reality. (...why did Cygnus fund the

RE: FW: FLTK versions in Cygwin [was: Re: units: update, FHS compliance]

2010-01-26 Thread Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]
Christopher Faylor sent the following at Tuesday, January 26, 2010 10:25 AM Christopher Faylor sent the following at Tuesday, January 26, 2010 9:38 AM On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:28:56PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: I don't much like it, but that's reality. (...why did Cygnus fund the early

Re: FW: FLTK versions in Cygwin [was: Re: units: update, FHS compliance]

2010-01-26 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:01:30AM -0500, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote: I know better than to argue with you in general and on this subject in particular. (For those who don't know, Chris used to work for Cygnus Solutions.) I just thought that it might be useful to point those who

Re: FW: FLTK versions in Cygwin [was: Re: units: update, FHS compliance]

2010-01-26 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:16:20AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:01:30AM -0500, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote: I know better than to argue with you in general and on this subject in particular. (For those who don't know, Chris used to work for Cygnus

Re: FLTK versions in Cygwin [was: Re: units: update, FHS compliance]

2010-01-25 Thread Albrecht Schlosser
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 24/01/2010 18:00, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: I'am aware that -mno-cygwin is no longer supported, but there's nothing we can do until a working gcc-4 cross compiler exists. So long we need to use gcc-3 for Windows/GDI builds (or Cygwin). That's what I'm trying to

Re: FLTK versions in Cygwin [was: Re: units: update, FHS compliance]

2010-01-25 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 25/01/2010 04:57, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: Point taken. But unfortunately the FLTK community decided it the other way with a majority of 74% (this must have been in or before 2003): http://www.fltk.org/poll.php?r1 Thus this is not likely to be changed. Sorry. Since when are matters such

Re: FLTK versions in Cygwin [was: Re: units: update, FHS compliance]

2010-01-25 Thread Charles Wilson
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 25/01/2010 04:57, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: Point taken. But unfortunately the FLTK community decided it the other way with a majority of 74% (this must have been in or before 2003): http://www.fltk.org/poll.php?r1 Thus this is not likely to be changed. Sorry.

FLTK versions in Cygwin [was: Re: units: update, FHS compliance]

2010-01-24 Thread Albrecht Schlosser
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 23/01/2010 09:32, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: Well, then there are probably good news from FLTK. The current development version (1.3.0) can be configured to work with cygwin/X11 OOTB: $ ./configure --enable-cygwin --enable-x11 I haven't tried the 1.3 branch, but

Re: FLTK versions in Cygwin [was: Re: units: update, FHS compliance]

2010-01-24 Thread Albrecht Schlosser
Albrecht Schlosser wrote: Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: [...] I haven't tried the 1.3 branch, but the 2.0 branch certainly does NOT work with Cygwin/X11 OOTB: http://cygwin-ports.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/cygwin-ports/ports/trunk/x11/fltk2/r6403-configure-cygwin.patch Defining _WIN32, using

Re: FLTK versions in Cygwin [was: Re: units: update, FHS compliance]

2010-01-24 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 24/01/2010 09:00, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: $ ./configure --enable-cygwin --enable-x11 --enable-shared Indeed, this does appear to work OOTB, although --enable-cygwin and --enable-x11 should be the defaults. I shouldn't have to say that I do *not* want to cross-compile (besides that

Re: FLTK versions in Cygwin [was: Re: units: update, FHS compliance]

2010-01-24 Thread Albrecht Schlosser
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On 24/01/2010 09:00, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: $ ./configure --enable-cygwin --enable-x11 --enable-shared Indeed, this does appear to work OOTB, although --enable-cygwin and --enable-x11 should be the defaults. I shouldn't have to say that I do *not* want to

Re: FLTK versions in Cygwin [was: Re: units: update, FHS compliance]

2010-01-24 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 24/01/2010 18:00, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: I'am aware that -mno-cygwin is no longer supported, but there's nothing we can do until a working gcc-4 cross compiler exists. So long we need to use gcc-3 for Windows/GDI builds (or Cygwin). That's what I'm trying to tell you: -mno-cygwin mean(t)