Igor Pechtchanski pechtcha at cs.nyu.edu writes:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, CV wrote:
After running the command gcc -E ext.c -o ext.pre and then
comparing ext.pre with tcl.h I think I can identify some of
the included bits, eg. the following:
You could also just look at the '# line' lines,
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, CV wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski pechtcha at cs.nyu.edu writes:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, CV wrote:
After running the command gcc -E ext.c -o ext.pre and then
comparing ext.pre with tcl.h I think I can identify some of
the included bits, eg. the following:
You could
--- Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Arg #3 is a pointer to a function (Tcl_CmdProc).
See where that's
declared *in the preprocessed file* (so that all
macros are expanded) and
see if your declarations of GetTimeFromSecs, etc,
correspond to it. The
most obvious mismatch is probably the const
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Patrick Samson wrote:
--- Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Arg #3 is a pointer to a function (Tcl_CmdProc). See where that's
declared *in the preprocessed file* (so that all macros are expanded)
and see if your declarations of GetTimeFromSecs, etc, correspond to
it. The
--- Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Patrick Samson wrote:
From a working source of Postgresql:
static int pltcl_elog(ClientData cdata, Tcl_Interp
*interp,
int argc, CONST84 char *argv[]);
^^^
I'm pretty confident
Hello,
FileRunner is a nifty little file manager that I have been
using for years under Linux and I would like to have it under
cygwin as well.
But I am stuck with installation on cygwin because I can't
get the included, very simple c-program to compile, probably
due to my own cluelessness about
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, CV wrote:
Hello,
FileRunner is a nifty little file manager that I have been
using for years under Linux and I would like to have it under
cygwin as well.
But I am stuck with installation on cygwin because I can't
get the included, very simple c-program to compile,
Thanks for your help Igor.
Actually I found the answer by googling for
___RUNTIME_PSEUDO_RELOC_LIST__. Someone had that problem
fixed by upgrading to the latest binutils.
I checked and my binutils was a 2002something version
while there is a 2004... one available.
What I can't understand is
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, CV wrote:
Thanks for your help Igor.
Actually I found the answer by googling for
___RUNTIME_PSEUDO_RELOC_LIST__. Someone had that problem fixed by
upgrading to the latest binutils.
Ah, right, that would do it. Strangely enough, Googling for partial
string
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, CV wrote:
Thanks for your help Igor.
Actually I found the answer by googling for
___RUNTIME_PSEUDO_RELOC_LIST__. Someone had that problem fixed by
upgrading to the latest binutils.
Ah, right, that would do it. Strangely enough, Googling for partial
Igor Pechtchanski pechtcha at cs.nyu.edu writes:
Did you check whether tcl.h gets included? If it is, it could be a bug in
ext.c.
I ran gcc -E as you suggested but was not sure how to interpret
the results. Looking at it a bit more closely I think it is clear
that tcl.h _does_ get included:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, CV wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski pechtcha at cs.nyu.edu writes:
Did you check whether tcl.h gets included? If it is, it could be a bug in
ext.c.
I ran gcc -E as you suggested but was not sure how to interpret
the results. Looking at it a bit more closely I think it is
12 matches
Mail list logo
