RE: Inter-Process Mutexes

2006-09-06 Thread Dave Korn
On 06 September 2006 10:58, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hi, > > Drake Baker, le Mon 04 Sep 2006 01:49:25 -0500, a crit : >> I have seen conflicting information on the web concerning inter-process >> mutexes in CYGWIN. I have seen outright statements that it is not >>

Re: Inter-Process Mutexes

2006-09-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hi, Drake Baker, le Mon 04 Sep 2006 01:49:25 -0500, a �crit : > I have seen conflicting information on the web concerning inter-process > mutexes in CYGWIN. I have seen outright statements that it is not > supported, and I have seen statements that ALL mutexes are inter-process by

Re: Inter-Process Mutexes

2006-09-04 Thread Václav Haisman
Drake Baker wrote: > Gentlemen, > > I have seen conflicting information on the web concerning inter-process > mutexes in CYGWIN. I have seen outright statements that it is not > supported, and I have seen statements that ALL mutexes are inter-process > by default. Obviously,

Inter-Process Mutexes

2006-09-03 Thread Drake Baker
Gentlemen, I have seen conflicting information on the web concerning inter-process mutexes in CYGWIN. I have seen outright statements that it is not supported, and I have seen statements that ALL mutexes are inter-process by default. Obviously, only one statement is currently correct. The