On Jun 23 09:48, Warren Young wrote:
> On Jun 23, 2016, at 6:18 AM, Corinna Vinschen <vinsc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > From 2.5.2 onwards, the Cygwin DLL is now available under the GNU LGPL v3,
> > rather
> > than the former GPLv3.
>
> I have mixed fe
On Jun 23, 2016, at 6:18 AM, Corinna Vinschen <vinsc...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> From 2.5.2 onwards, the Cygwin DLL is now available under the GNU LGPL v3,
> rather
> than the former GPLv3.
I have mixed feelings about this.
On the one hand, it means we get the same freedoms
Hi folks,
I'm pleased to announce that the today's upcoming release of the Cygwin
library (version 2.5.2) introduces a license change. From 2.5.2
onwards, the Cygwin DLL is now available under the GNU LGPL v3, rather
than the former GPLv3.
The official Red Hat announcement:
https
Hi folks,
I'm pleased to announce that the today's upcoming release of the Cygwin
library (version 2.5.2) introduces a license change. From 2.5.2
onwards, the Cygwin DLL is now available under the GNU LGPL v3, rather
than the former GPLv3.
The official Red Hat announcement:
https
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
Sent: 21 April 2004 03:05
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 08:51:15PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
At 08:17 PM 4/20/2004, you wrote:
Will the cygwin.dll become LGPL at one time in the future?
Anything is possible
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 09:47:02AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Christopher Faylor writes:
I have little say in the matter anymore but I'd say that this is about
as possible as me suddenly becoming un-mean.
The interesting question now is, would these be related incidents ;-)
I have no say
Christopher Faylor writes:
I have little say in the matter anymore but I'd say that
this is about
as possible as me suddenly becoming un-mean.
The interesting question now is, would these be related incidents ;-)
MSNBC News - this just in : the GPL makes people mean! News at 11.
Christopher Faylor writes:
I have little say in the matter anymore but I'd say that this is about
as possible as me suddenly becoming un-mean.
The interesting question now is, would these be related incidents ;-)
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | GNU LilyPond - The music
On Apr 21 02:17, Bart van der Werf (Bluelive) wrote:
Will the cygwin.dll become LGPL at one time in the future?
The viral GPL clause really makes me not want to use it with my BSD
licensed application.
Your problem. Read http://cygwin.com/licensing.html again:
In accordance with section 10
-Original Message-
From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Bart van der Werf (Bluelive)
Sent: 21 April 2004 01:17
Will the cygwin.dll become LGPL at one time in the future?
The viral GPL clause really makes me not want to use it with my BSD
licensed application.
Grtz, Bart
0
Will the cygwin.dll become LGPL at one time in the future?
The viral GPL clause really makes me not want to use it with my BSD
licensed application.
Grtz, Bart
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Bart van der Werf (Bluelive) wrote:
Will the cygwin.dll become LGPL at one time in the future?
The viral GPL clause really makes me not want to use it with my BSD
licensed application.
(Furthering the FUD about the GPL being viral could cause a lot of people to
buy
At 08:17 PM 4/20/2004, you wrote:
Will the cygwin.dll become LGPL at one time in the future?
Anything is possible but there is no plan to do this.
--
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 08:51:15PM -0400, Larry Hall wrote:
At 08:17 PM 4/20/2004, you wrote:
Will the cygwin.dll become LGPL at one time in the future?
Anything is possible but there is no plan to do this.
I have little say in the matter anymore but I'd say that this is about
as possible as me
14 matches
Mail list logo
