Eric Blake redhat.com> writes:
>
> On 03/04/2011 11:12 AM, Peter Binney wrote:
> > When running "ls -l" the permissions field shows as "--+".
>
> Which means that the owner has no permissions, but that there are ACLs
> which allow others permissions. Not entirely unusual, given Windows
Have found my solution ... robocopy. Using it's /secfix option copied
files are owned by the copying user.
eg: robocopy x:\tmp .\tmp /e /secfix
Note: you need a not-too-old version of Robocopy for the /secfix
support (I was using v 1.96).
On 16 March 2011 19:09, Peter Binney wrote:
> Eric Blak
When running "ls -l" the permissions field shows as "--+".
Oddly, "ls -l" shows the correct permissions if the pathname uses the
windows drive letter syntax. eg:
$ pwd
/cygdrive/c
$ ls -l tmp/plb.txt
--+ 1 ga2binn Domain Users 5527 Mar 3 13:54 tmp/plb.txt
$ ls -l c:/tmp/plb.txt
-r
On 03/04/2011 11:12 AM, Peter Binney wrote:
> When running "ls -l" the permissions field shows as "--+".
Which means that the owner has no permissions, but that there are ACLs
which allow others permissions. Not entirely unusual, given Windows'
ability to create files with a different own
4 matches
Mail list logo