Re: Latest setup.exe not code-signed?

Greetings, Kal Sze! > It looks like the new setup-x86_64.exe is not code-signed? Is that on > purpose? IIRC, the previous versions were code-signed. No. > Do we now only > rely on the .sig signature file to verify it? Been like that all the time. -- With best regards, Andrey Repin Thursday,

Re: Latest setup.exe not code-signed?

Hello, On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:58 AM, Kal Sze wrote: > Hello, > > It looks like the new setup-x86_64.exe is not code-signed? Is that on > purpose? IIRC, the previous versions were code-signed. Do we now only > rely on the .sig signature file to verify it? It was never

Latest setup.exe not code-signed?

Hello, It looks like the new setup-x86_64.exe is not code-signed? Is that on purpose? IIRC, the previous versions were code-signed. Do we now only rely on the .sig signature file to verify it? Cheers, Kal -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ:

Re: [PATCH] Retry replacing in-use files in setup (Was Re: call for testing of latest setup.exe snapshot)

On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Oct 29 22:50, Igor Peshansky wrote: Ping. It's been over a month, which means the archives won't automatically keep thread history, so here's the link to the original message (with the patch):

Re: [PATCH] Retry replacing in-use files in setup (Was Re: call for testing of latest setup.exe snapshot)

Ping. It's been over a month, which means the archives won't automatically keep thread history, so here's the link to the original message (with the patch): http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2006-08/msg00073.html. Opinions? Can I apply this? Igor On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Igor Peshansky

Re: call for testing of latest setup.exe snapshot

On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Igor Peshansky wrote: On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, Brian Dessent wrote: [snip] http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2006-02/msg00099.html So, we have a couple of issues here. Firstly, the bug/unintended feature of -r causing the infinite retries until the file can be

Re: call for testing of latest setup.exe snapshot

Peter D. Stout schrieb: I was testing the snapshot this morning and noticed a couple of minor issues. First, if the location of the Cygwin files changes on a mirror, then setup lists the mirror twice in the chooser and reports an error that the selected mirror has been removed when you click

Re: call for testing of latest setup.exe snapshot

It worked fine for me (except as all previous versions it wants to reinstall source only gcc-testsuite when I select install). - Alexey. Brian Dessent wrote: I've just uploaded http://cygwin.com/setup/snapshots/setup-2.551.exe. If you had experienced any problems with previous versions please

Re: call for testing of latest setup.exe snapshot

On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, Brian Dessent wrote: I've just uploaded http://cygwin.com/setup/snapshots/setup-2.551.exe. Hi, Brian. I meant to reply sooner -- sorry for the delay. Thanks a lot for doing this! If you had experienced any problems with previous versions please try this one and report

Re: call for testing of latest setup.exe snapshot

On Sun, 06 Aug 2006 19:00:39 -0700, Brian Dessent wrote: I've just uploaded http://cygwin.com/setup/snapshots/setup-2.551.exe. Brian, I was testing the snapshot this morning and noticed a couple of minor issues. First, if the location of the Cygwin files changes on a mirror, then setup

call for testing of latest setup.exe snapshot

I've just uploaded http://cygwin.com/setup/snapshots/setup-2.551.exe. If you had experienced any problems with previous versions please try this one and report if it solves your issue or not. The above is CVS HEAD as of this moment. I committed several outstanding patches (sorry for the huge

Latest setup.exe issue

Hi, I found a minor problem with latest setup.exe I downloaded today in the morning. It doesn't care about colors being set as default by system and in the TreeView when you select particular parts of cygwin to be installed it explicitly sets background color of nodes to white but doesn't

Re: Latest setup.exe issue

Milan Reznicek wrote: I found a minor problem with latest setup.exe I downloaded today in the morning. It doesn't care about colors being set as default by This has been fixed for some time. The fix is in the current setup.exe snapshot but the last release version was made before

RE: Latest setup.exe issue

Thanks, Milan Řezníček -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Dessent Sent: Sunday, December 25, 2005 12:53 PM To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Latest setup.exe issue Milan Reznicek wrote: I found a minor problem with latest

Re: Latest setup.exe

On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 03:56, Joseph Davida wrote: I got around the problem by removing the old C:\cygwin (actually by renaming it to cygwin.old) and restarting the setup.exe. So it appears current setup.exe will cause this problem on Win2K if it installs on top of an exsisting

Re: Latest setup.exe

Nop! package dir is c:\downloads\cygwin\packages. Joe --- Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 03:56, Joseph Davida wrote: I got around the problem by removing the old C:\cygwin (actually by renaming it to cygwin.old) and restarting the setup.exe. So it

Re: Latest setup.exe

I got around the problem by removing the old C:\cygwin (actually by renaming it to cygwin.old) and restarting the setup.exe. So it appears current setup.exe will cause this problem on Win2K if it installs on top of an exsisting installation. Cheers, Joe Joseph Davida wrote: I tried the beta

Re: Latest setup.exe

Please keep replies on list! Joseph I. Davida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It appears that this setup.exe is depleting the VM pool. There is either a bad memory leak problem, or there is a boundless recursion in the calls. I suspect the it is a memory leak problem. The machine has 512M sdram

Re: Latest setup.exe

I tried the beta version Max suggested and it also exhibits the same behaviour on my win2k laptop; i.e. sucks up huge mem (depletes VM), and yet after more than 1 hour of running, it still says 1% of base-files 1.1-1 is installed. The total progress meter shows only about a sliver of progress :)

Latest setup.exe

The latest setup.exe dies with the following error banner titled: Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime Error Runtime Error Program: C:\download\cygwin\setup.exe Abnormal Program termination This happens after about 1

Re: Latest setup.exe

Joseph I. Davida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The latest setup.exe dies with the following Latest release (2.249.2.5) or latest beta (2.303) ? error banner titled: Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime Error Runtime Error Program: C:\download\cygwin\setup.exe Abnormal Program termination

RE: cannot install from local disk with latest setup.exe-2.249.2.2

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dr. Volker Zell Sent: Thursday, 13 June 2002 5:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cannot install from local disk with latest setup.exe-2.249.2.2 Hi I usually install packages in two

RE: cannot install from local disk with latest setup.exe-2.249.2.2

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dr. Volker Zell Sent: Thursday, 13 June 2002 5:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cannot install from local disk with latest setup.exe-2.249.2.2 Hi I usually install packages in two

RE: cannot install from local disk with latest setup.exe-2.249.2.2

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dr. Volker Zell Sent: Thursday, 13 June 2002 10:02 PM Yap, false alarm, I tried again and after a couple of minutes I was presented with the package dialog. Maybe I need a faster computer :-)

Latest Setup.exe Fails (Win2k)

Hi there. The latest setup.exe fails on my system: 100% CPU indefinetly and all the screen says is something like 'this space intentionally blank.' I've tried 10 different mirrors, it downloads something from them Itelling me if it can't or if the setup.ini is out of date in relation to the exe

RE: Latest Setup.exe Fails (Win2k)

Sorry - forgot the obvious: it is the latest version at the time of writing, which is 2.218.2.8. Hi there. The latest setup.exe fails on my system: 100% CPU indefinetly and all the screen says is something like 'this space intentionally blank.' I've tried 10 different mirrors

Re[2]: Latest Setup.exe Fails (Win2k)

time of writing, which is 2.218.2.8. LG Hi there. The latest setup.exe fails on my system: 100% CPU indefinetly and all the screen says is something like 'this space intentionally blank.' I've tried 10 different mirrors, it downloads something from them Itelling me if it can't

Re[2]: Latest Setup.exe Fails (Win2k)

, with 100% use of a 1400 mhz CPU. Thanks - HTH lee Wednesday, May 15, 2002, 1:29:10 PM, you wrote: LG Sorry - forgot the obvious: it is the latest version at the LG time of writing, which is 2.218.2.8. LG Hi there. The latest setup.exe fails on my system: 100% CPU indefinetly

Re: Latest Setup.exe Fails (Win2k)

On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 02:53:30PM +0200, Lee Goddard wrote: In every case, the systsem hangs with the dialogue box saying This space intentionally blank (or such) and the window is shown as Not responding in Windows' task manager, with 100% use of a 1400 mhz CPU. I hate to chime in with a me

Re[3]: Latest Setup.exe Fails (Win2k)

Hello Lee, Wednesday, May 15, 2002, 2:53:30 PM, you wrote: LG In two cases, my package dirs contain just setup.ini. LG In one case, I have etc, which contains three files: last-cache, LG timestamp, and last-mirror. The latter contains just the URI: LG

Re[3]: Latest Setup.exe Fails (Win2k)

Well, I had deleted it; but in another case, I have this, going with WIn2k defaults: C:\cygwin\etc\setup\last-cache C:\cygwin\etc\setup\last-mirror C:\cygwin\etc\setup\timestamp C:\cygwin\var\log\setup.log C:\cygwin\var\log\setup.log.full I'm happy to send the logs if you wish. One note, in

Re[4]: Latest Setup.exe Fails (Win2k)

Hello Lee, On the 4th setup page (screen) you are prompted for Local Package Directory. I am interested of the contents of the directory you entered on that screen and in any subdirectories of the above directory which loook like URLs. Wednesday, May 15, 2002, 3:55:32 PM, you wrote: LG Well,

Re[4]: Latest Setup.exe Fails (Win2k)

At 16:20 15/05/2002 +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote: Hello Lee, Hi On the 4th setup page (screen) you are prompted for Local Package Directory. I am interested of the contents of the directory you entered on that screen and in any subdirectories of the above directory which loook like URLs. Sorry -

Re: Latest Setup.exe Fails (Win2k)

Lee Goddard wrote: Sorry - forgot the obvious: it is the latest version at the time of writing, which is 2.218.2.8. Hi there. The latest setup.exe fails on my system: 100% CPU indefinetly and all the screen says is something like 'this space intentionally blank.' I've tried

Re: has anyone tried latest setup.exe from cvs ?

- Original Message - From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 12:04 PM Subject: Re: has anyone tried latest setup.exe from cvs ? On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 10:52:11AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: - Original Message - From

Re: has anyone tried latest setup.exe from cvs ?

On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 12:11:25PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: - Original Message - This is an example that would kill setup.exe: @ ash sdesc: A Bourne Shell (/bin/sh) workalike category: Base Shells requires: cygwin install: latest/ash/ash-20011018-1.tar.bz2 33819 source:

RE: has anyone tried latest setup.exe from cvs ?

Sort of. The problem though is that I'm nearing the completion of some pretty extensive changes to the GUI code, so if there's problems with that in the cvs stuff I might not even know about it. I did however run across a problem in the INI-parsing code that does prevent it from working.