Greetings, Kal Sze!
> It looks like the new setup-x86_64.exe is not code-signed? Is that on
> purpose? IIRC, the previous versions were code-signed.
No.
> Do we now only
> rely on the .sig signature file to verify it?
Been like that all the time.
--
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Thursday,
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:58 AM, Kal Sze wrote:
> Hello,
>
> It looks like the new setup-x86_64.exe is not code-signed? Is that on
> purpose? IIRC, the previous versions were code-signed. Do we now only
> rely on the .sig signature file to verify it?
It was never code signed and the reaso
Hello,
It looks like the new setup-x86_64.exe is not code-signed? Is that on
purpose? IIRC, the previous versions were code-signed. Do we now only
rely on the .sig signature file to verify it?
Cheers,
Kal
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cyg
3 matches
Mail list logo
