At 2003-10-31 01:08 PM, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Lee D. Rothstein wrote:
Either Cygwin or I be confused. (I'm betting on I. ;-))
Bingo.
I have deleted '/tmp' ('d:/Cygwin/tmp' -- using Explorer)
and issued: 'umount /tmp' and 'mount 'e:\tmp /tmp' repeatedly.
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003, Lee D. Rothstein wrote:
At 2003-10-31 01:08 PM, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Lee D. Rothstein wrote:
Either Cygwin or I be confused. (I'm betting on I. ;-))
Bingo.
I have deleted '/tmp' ('d:/Cygwin/tmp' -- using Explorer)
and issued: 'umount
At 2003-11-01 03:27 PM, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
At 2003-10-31 01:08 PM, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Why do /zc, /zd, /ze, /zf, /zg, ... ('mount c:/ /zc', ...
'mount g:/ /zg, ...) appear in ls output when no prior
'mkdir's have been carried out. What's different between
/tmp and /everything
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003, Lee D. Rothstein wrote:
At 2003-11-01 03:27 PM, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
At 2003-10-31 01:08 PM, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Why do /zc, /zd, /ze, /zf, /zg, ... ('mount c:/ /zc', ...
'mount g:/ /zg, ...) appear in ls output when no prior
'mkdir's have been carried out.
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Lee D. Rothstein wrote:
Either Cygwin or I be confused. (I'm betting on I. ;-))
Bingo.
I have deleted '/tmp' ('d:/Cygwin/tmp' -- using Explorer)
and issued: 'umount /tmp' and 'mount 'e:\tmp /tmp' repeatedly.
^^
Either Cygwin or I be confused. (I'm betting on I. ;-))
I have deleted '/tmp' ('d:/Cygwin/tmp' -- using Explorer)
and issued: 'umount /tmp' and 'mount 'e:\tmp /tmp' repeatedly.
All the other mounts to '/' appear in an 'ls' of '/',
but '/tmp' ('e:/tmp'), does not.
While the apps seem to find
6 matches
Mail list logo