[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> But: clicking on the gizmo to change from "All Default" to
>>> "All Install" caused such a long pause that eventually I
>>> checked to see what was happening. Answer:
>>> "Setup Options [not responding]". It happened identically
>>> at a second atte
Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Leading. I meant leading (line 1).
Leading linefeed. Ah, empty lines are not allowed in the header.
I'll have a look tonight.
Thanks,
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 23:54, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Has the timestamp definition changed?
> >
> > No, but the entry to the packages area has, your trailing linefeed
Leading. I meant leading (line 1).
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at: http://
Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Has the timestamp definition changed?
>
> No, but the entry to the packages area has, your trailing linefeed
:-)
> is the likely culprit.
Forgive my ignorance, but I don't understand the concept of
`trailing linefeed'. Do you mean that whitespace
> directory (havent tried the other modes yet). Look for a line which looks
> like this
> in the attached setup.log file:
Sorry, forgot the attachments :(
--
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++
NEU: Mit GMX ins Internet. Rund um die Uhr für 1 ct/ Min. surfen!
setup.log
Des
Hello,
> We're at that time again, where your testing directly influences the
> quality of setup.exe that you get to run.
>
> So,
> at http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/ there is a new setup.exe
> snapshot, that is (as far as we know) devoid of major bugs.
1. If i try to install from local d
>> But: clicking on the gizmo to change from "All Default" to
>> "All Install" caused such a long pause that eventually I
>> checked to see what was happening. Answer:
>> "Setup Options [not responding]". It happened identically
>> at a second attempt. Extended pause with nothing at the end
>> of i
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 09:09, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Has the timestamp definition changed?
No, but the entry to the packages area has, your trailing linefeed is
the likely culprit.
I had some hairy stuff happening at one point, and the unlimited \
Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So,
> at http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/ there is a new setup.exe
> snapshot, that is (as far as we know) devoid of major bugs.
> Please, please, try this setup.exe out and tell us what you think.
It works fine, but I do get this error message:
> From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 01:33, John Morrison wrote:
> > Can't you get the number of files from setup.ini?
>
> Not if there isn't one, which is still (grudglingly) supported.
> Also, for *any* sort of accuracy, how many files are there is needed,
>
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 07:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Tried it twice again: full install from scratch but this time from a Local
> Directory. Now the MD5 check took place, as Igor said it would. Everything
> passed.
>
> Base install works fine.
>
> But: clicking on the gizmo to change from "All
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 01:33, John Morrison wrote:
> Can't you get the number of files from setup.ini?
Not if there isn't one, which is still (grudglingly) supported.
Also, for *any* sort of accuracy, how many files are there is needed,
otherwise my 8000 entry test file will spend more time updat
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 05:03, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> This question has come up more than once already, so I'll take a stab at
> the answer:
> The explicit MD5 sum check, IIUC, is performed only when doing Install
> from Local Directory to make sure the external tools did not corrupt the
> downlo
Tried it twice again: full install from scratch but this time from a Local
Directory. Now the MD5 check took place, as Igor said it would. Everything
passed.
Base install works fine.
But: clicking on the gizmo to change from "All Default" to "All Install"
caused such a long pause* that eventually
me to notice. When should i have seen the md5 test ?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 11:33 AM
> Subject: New setup.exe beta.
>
> > We're a
11:33 AM
Subject: New setup.exe beta.
> We're at that time again, where your testing directly influences the
> quality of setup.exe that you get to run.
>
> So,
> at http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/ there is a new setup.exe
> snapshot, that is (as far as we know) d
On 26 Nov 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 00:26, John Morrison wrote:
> > Congratulations to all :)
> >
> > I've tried it and a couple of collegues (I
> > ran the net installation they ran local). Nobody
> > found anything wrong. There was, however, one
> > suggestion; they li
I've tried it twice. Both brand new installations after removing all
previous traces of Cygwin including registry entries. First time: just
install base. Second time: just install base, then run setup again (i.e. as
"update" really) and install half a dozen additional extras. Faultless both
times.
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 00:26, John Morrison wrote:
> Congratulations to all :)
>
> I've tried it and a couple of collegues (I
> ran the net installation they ran local). Nobody
> found anything wrong. There was, however, one
> suggestion; they liked the progress for MD5 but
> they wanted an overa
Congratulations to all :)
I've tried it and a couple of collegues (I
ran the net installation they ran local). Nobody
found anything wrong. There was, however, one
suggestion; they liked the progress for MD5 but
they wanted an overall progress in addition to
one for each package (and they wanted
We're at that time again, where your testing directly influences the
quality of setup.exe that you get to run.
So,
at http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/ there is a new setup.exe
snapshot, that is (as far as we know) devoid of major bugs.
It has many many new features. They include:
* More co
21 matches
Mail list logo
